Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Nitesh Kumar Singh; Laavanya Kaushik; Mohnish Sehrawat v. Babu Lal Meena
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's condonation of delay in filing an OA for non-declaration of ST category results, holding that limitation did not commence as the cause of action persisted.
Chandrakant Shinde v. Maharashtra Gramin Bank
The Court held that disciplinary proceedings under service regulations not notified under Section 13B of the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 are illegal, reinstated the applicability of Model Standing Orders, and set aside the dismissal while awarding partial back wages.
Dharambir Singh v. M/S Hindustan Unilever Ltd. and Ors.
The Delhi High Court correctly held that the Labour Court at Delhi lacked territorial jurisdiction over the termination dispute of an employee posted and terminated at Faridabad.
Inderjeet Singh v. Kamala Nehru College & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a dissent based on erroneous eligibility criteria cannot invalidate a selection and quashed the direction to re-advertise, directing appointment as per the original merit list.
Managing Committee National Public School v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld that closure of a recognized school requires prior approval with conditions including absorption of surplus employees, affirming a single employer relationship across multiple branches of a private unaided school.
Managing Committee National Public School v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the requirement that closure of a recognized school must be approved with conditions including absorption of surplus employees in other branches, affirming the regulatory authority under the Delhi School Education Act and Rules.
Sudhanshu and Ors v. Union of India and Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioners' challenge to their exclusion from overseas deployment due to their promotion zone status, upholding the binding executive policy restricting such deployment.
N. Raghavender v. State of Andhra Pradesh, CBI
The Supreme Court set aside the appellant's conviction for criminal breach of trust, cheating, and falsification of accounts due to insufficient evidence and procedural lapses, emphasizing the necessity of proving mens rea and lawful authorization in bank fraud cases.
Harji Engineering Works Private Limited v. Punjab and Sind Bank & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the valid invocation of bank guarantees within the stipulated claim period under their terms, dismissing the appellant's challenge based on wrongful termination and special equities.
Padma Mishra v. State of Uttarakhand & Anr.
The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's refusal to quash an FIR under the Gangsters Act, holding that prima facie allegations of violence and intimidation justify registration and the limited scope of quashing under Article 226.
GNCTD through Medical Director LNJP Hospital v. Beenu Pawar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing regularization of a long-serving casual lab technician despite her diploma being from a non-recognized institution, emphasizing fairness and continuous service over procedural technicalities.
The State of Maharashtra v. Vitthal Tulshiram Jadhav
The Bombay High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing counting of the respondent's past temporary service for pension, excluding the interruption period, under the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules.
Dharmender Choudhary v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of respondents in a criminal trespass case, holding that the dispute was civil in nature and prosecution failed to prove criminal trespass beyond reasonable doubt.
Venkateshwara Hatcheries Private Limited v. The Commissioner of Central Excise
The Bombay High Court allowed the appellant's appeal holding that veterinary and laboratory testing services incidental to commission agent services are exempt under Notification No. 13/2003 and that the extended limitation period for service tax demand was not invokable in absence of fraud or suppression.
National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India Ltd v. V.D. Agro Tech Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that a Section 34 petitioner cannot introduce additional documents not before the arbitral tribunal to dispute factual findings unless exceptional circumstances exist, reaffirming the limited scope of evidence admissible in challenges to arbitral awards rendered before 30 August 2019.
Punjab National Bank & Ors. v. S K Jain
The Delhi High Court upheld the quashing of disciplinary proceedings against a bank officer due to failure to prove relied-upon documents through oral evidence, emphasizing the necessity of fair procedure in departmental inquiries.
Mukesh Kumar v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Mukesh Kumar for dowry death and cruelty, affirming that persistent harassment for dowry establishes the requisite proximate link to death under Section 304B IPC.
Shivmoori Jagatdev Kushwaha v. Assistant Division Engineer
The Bombay High Court upheld eviction of a petitioner occupying railway premises under a temporary agreement, affirming that railway property qualifies as public premises under the Public Premises Act, 1971, and dismissed challenges to procedural and jurisdictional aspects of the eviction.
Laguna Resort Pvt. Ltd. v. Concept Hospitality Pvt. Ltd.
The Bombay High Court upheld an arbitral award and held that time spent in prior arbitration proceedings set aside can be excluded under Section 43(4) of the Arbitration Act even if fresh arbitration arises under a different agreement or merged entity, and that jurisdictional objections not raised before the arbitrator cannot be belatedly raised before the Court.
Bengal Waterproof Ltd v. UOI and Anr
The Delhi High Court held that BIFR cannot restrain a sick company from disposing of fixed assets through administrative practice directions without passing a formal statutory order under Section 22A of SICA.