Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Ashok Kumar Valecha & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal, holding it liable for compensation as the driver named in the claim petition was admitted to be driving at the time of the accident and unpleaded evidence regarding another driver was inadmissible.
Bhushan Kumar v. Director of Education
The Delhi High Court held that professional fitness for re-employment of retired teachers up to age 62 must be assessed by the Deputy Director of Education, not the school Managing Committee, and set aside the refusal order accordingly.
M/S MINDA NEXGENTECH LIMITED v. TUSHAR KANTI GHOSH
The Delhi High Court decreed a summary suit for recovery of money where the defendant failed to comply with procedural requirements under Order XXXVII CPC and did not seek leave to defend.
M/S GUAR CONSTRUCTION CO v. DDA
The Delhi High Court disposed of a civil suit without adjudication as the parties referred their contract disputes to arbitration and the arbitral award was awaited.
M/s. Futuristic Sales Private Limited v. M/s. Globe Panel Industries India Private Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed the application to dispense with convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for approval of a Scheme of Arrangement under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, based on overwhelming written consents.
M/s. Bhartiya Finstock Private Limited v. M/s. Springdale Trading Private Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed a joint application to dispense with convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for approval of a Scheme of Amalgamation where all parties consented and no secured creditors or investigations were pending.
M/s. C. A. Process Industries Private Limited v. M/s. Jaipuria Beverages & Food Industries Private Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed a joint application under Section 391(1) of the Companies Act, 1956 to dispense with convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for approving a Scheme of Amalgamation where all parties had given written consent.
Inter Alliance Consultants Private Limited v. J.A. Textiles Private Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed a joint application under Section 391(1) of the Companies Act, 1956 to dispense with convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for approving a Scheme of Amalgamation where all parties had given their written consent.
Integrated Waste Management and Urban Services Company (Tamil Nadu) Limited v. IL&FS Environmental Infrastructure & Services Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Arrangement under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 for amalgamation of a wholly owned subsidiary into its parent company after ensuring compliance and absence of objections.
Ashok Kumar Gupta v. Government of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that a private employer adopting CCS(CCA) Rules mutatis mutandis can validly initiate departmental proceedings against erstwhile government employees transferred to it, dismissing the challenge to the charge-sheet on jurisdictional grounds.
Vikram Kapur & Ors. v. Atlas Cycles (Haryana) Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that inter-se family MOUs do not bind the company, which retains overall control, and set aside an injunction restraining the company from restructuring its units.
Geeta Devi v. M/S Updater Services (P) Ltd. & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal’s finding that the petitioner was transferred, not terminated, and dismissed the writ petition challenging the award under Section 2A of the Industrial Disputes Act.
Rakesh Beniwal v. M/S Updater Services (P) Ltd. & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal’s finding that the petitioner’s services were not terminated but transferred, dismissing the writ petition challenging the award under Section 2A of the Industrial Disputes Act.
Indian Farmers Fertilizer Co Ltd v. IFFCO
The Delhi High Court accepted the parties' out-of-court settlement and decreed the civil suit accordingly, disposing of the matter by a compromise decree.
Jagpreet Kaur Gandhi v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a contractual employee’s termination on undefined "business grounds" for non-compliance with contractual terms and held that concealment of material facts bars relief for regularization.
Rajwati v. M/S Updater Services (P) Ltd. & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Industrial Tribunal’s finding that the petitioner was transferred and not terminated, holding that Section 2A of the Industrial Disputes Act does not apply to transfers and the petitioner’s claim was not maintainable.
National Front of Indian Trade Unions (DHN) v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court directed fresh verification of the petitioner trade union's membership for recognition as a central trade union, holding that procedural lapses cannot deny verification if eligibility criteria are met.
Mohd Sohail & Ors. v. State Govt of NCT Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed two FIRs involving non-heinous offences based on an amicable settlement between parties, applying the principles laid down in Gian Singh and Narinder Singh cases under Section 482 CrPC.
Mohd Sohail & Ors. v. State Govt of NCT Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed two cross FIRs under non-heinous IPC sections based on an amicable settlement between parties, applying the principles laid down by the Supreme Court for exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Om Prakash and Ors. v. State and Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed quashing of an FIR under Sections 356, 332, 506, 186, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, applying the principles governing the exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.