Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Asha Rani v. NDMC
NDMC can levy separate conversion charges for change of use from residential to commercial flats in Sarojini Nagar Market, requiring statutory permission under Section 252, notwithstanding prior conversion from leasehold to freehold.
Asha Rani v. NDMC
NDMC can lawfully levy conversion charges for change of use from residential to commercial in Sarojini Nagar Market flats, independent of leasehold to freehold conversion charges, requiring statutory permission under Section 252 of the NDMC Act.
Asha Rani v. NDMC
The Delhi High Court held that NDMC can lawfully levy conversion charges for changing flats in Sarojini Nagar Market from residential to commercial use, requiring statutory permission under Section 252 of the NDMC Act.
Asha Rani v. NDMC
The Delhi High Court upheld NDMC's levy of conversion charges for changing flats in Sarojini Nagar Market from residential to commercial use, holding that such charges are distinct from leasehold to freehold conversion fees and require statutory permission.
Asha Rani v. NDMC
The Delhi High Court held that NDMC can levy separate conversion charges for change of use from residential to commercial flats in Sarojini Nagar Market, requiring statutory permission under Section 252 of the NDMC Act, dismissing petitions challenging such charges.
Asha Rani v. NDMC
NDMC can levy conversion charges for change of use from residential to commercial flats in Sarojini Nagar Market, requiring statutory permission under Section 252 NDMC Act, independent of leasehold to freehold conversion.
Asha Rani v. NDMC
The Delhi High Court held that conversion charges for change of use from residential to commercial are distinct from leasehold to freehold conversion charges and lawfully payable under NDMC regulations.
Asha Rani v. NDMC
NDMC can lawfully levy separate conversion charges for change of use from residential to commercial flats in Sarojini Nagar Market, independent of leasehold to freehold conversion charges.
Asha Rani v. NDMC
NDMC can levy separate conversion charges for change of use from residential to commercial under Section 252 of the NDMC Act despite prior conversion from leasehold to freehold at commercial rates.
M/S KRISHI RASAYAN EXPORTS PVT LTD v. M/S INDO -SWISS CHEMICALS LTD
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction restraining the defendant from using a deceptively similar trade name 'POSHAK' infringing the plaintiff's registered trademark 'PAUSHAK' for agro-chemical products.
Sreenivasulu Budigi v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a transfer order as withdrawn, granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal with an appropriate application.
Vijay Dahiya & Anr v. Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, UOI & Anr
The Delhi High Court directed the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting to consider a petitioners' representation on banning alcohol advertisements and take appropriate action, disposing of the public interest litigation without ruling on the merits.
Punjab & Sind Bank v. M/S Narain Dass Agencies (South)
The Delhi High Court upheld the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal's order reducing interest rate and allowing time for payment, dismissing the bank's challenge on limitation and interest grounds.
M/S PANKHURI INTERNATIONAL AND ORS v. BANK OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court allowed petitioners to file a fresh detailed application for document production before the Debt Recovery Tribunal, dismissing earlier applications for lack of particulars, and disposed of the writ petition accordingly.
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Aman Taneja & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's application for condonation of a 270-day delay in filing an appeal against a MACT award, holding that the appellant failed to demonstrate bona fide prosecution and due diligence.
Amit Nagpal v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a serious economic offence case, emphasizing that pre-conviction detention is punitive and bail should be granted unless there is a necessity to prevent tampering or ensure trial attendance.
Asha Rani v. NDMC
The Delhi High Court held that NDMC can lawfully levy conversion charges for changing flats in Sarojini Nagar Market from residential to commercial use, requiring statutory permission under Section 252 of the NDMC Act, distinct from leasehold to freehold conversion charges.
Pradeep Kumar v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 304A IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement and absence of culpable negligence, applying the principles of inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
S.N. Puri v. Rajan Kapoor & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld a decree on admission in favor of plaintiff No.1 based on admissions by defendant and held that plaintiff No.2, as attorney, lacked authority to settle ownership claims, dismissing the appeal.
Harjinder Singh Anand v. Daljeet Singh Anand
The Delhi High Court upheld a partition decree declaring two brothers as joint owners of a property, rejecting fraud allegations due to lack of evidence and affirming the presumption of title under a registered conveyance deed.