Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Uday Singh & Ors v. Union of India & Ors
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation remains unpaid for over five years after the award, regardless of possession.
Shri Sher Singh & Ors v. Union of India & Ors
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is not paid within five years of the award, granting the petitioners relief accordingly.
Ram Kumar v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession is not taken and compensation is not paid or offered, and that mere deposit of compensation in the treasury without possession does not prevent lapse.
Parmanand v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 499-502 IPC based on a settlement between parties, affirming the High Court's inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to quash non-compoundable offences arising from family disputes.
Parmanand v. State and Another
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 420, 467, 468, and 471 IPC based on a settlement between parties, affirming the High Court's power under Section 482 CrPC to quash non-compoundable offences where justice so requires.
Sourav Taneja v. Swati Taneja
The Delhi High Court declined to quash a domestic violence complaint on limitation grounds, directing the trial court to expeditiously decide the pending application for dismissal under Section 468 Cr.P.C.
M/S. SWASTIKA ENTERPRISES & ANR v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS & ORS
The Supreme Court held that an endorsement on the Bill of Entry demanding customs duty constitutes a valid notice of demand under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, entitling the appellants to its benefits.
M/S. JASWAL NECO LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, VISAKHAPATNAM
The Supreme Court held that anti-dumping duty exemption applies prospectively, interest on customs duties requires express bond or statutory provision, and penalty for export obligation failure is unjustified absent contumacious conduct.
M/S JAPAN AIRLINES CO. LTD v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEW DELHI
The Supreme Court held that landing and parking charges paid by foreign airlines to AAI are payments for services under Section 194-C and not rent under Section 194-I, thereby allowing TDS deduction at 2% instead of 20%.
Director General E.S.I.C v. Dr. Satish Kumar Azad & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld that uncommunicated adverse entries in Annual Confidential Reports cannot be relied upon for denying promotions, reaffirming the principle that every ACR entry must be communicated to the employee within a reasonable time.
Mangla Singhi v. Union of India
The High Court set aside the Tribunal's dismissal of the petitioner's application on limitation grounds and remanded the matter for hearing on the substantive grievance of discriminatory shortlisting criteria by UPSC.
Commissioner of Income Tax-VT v. L'LJi!JI1 Video Electronics Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeals, holding that lease rental income reversal and tax treatment by the assessee were appropriate in the absence of a claim under Section 32AB of the Income Tax Act.
Gurcharan Singh Walia v. Renu Goyal
The Delhi High Court dismissed two criminal miscellaneous petitions as withdrawn on the petitioner's unconditional request.
Smt Bala v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for abduction and rape of a minor but modified sentences by treating the period of incarceration already served as the sentence, exercising discretion under the proviso to Section 376 IPC.
Preeti Wadhwan v. State
The Delhi High Court granted interim protection from arrest to petitioners in anticipatory bail applications pending before the trial court due to lawyers' abstention, directing no coercive action until the next hearing date.
WG. CDR. (RETD.) SH. YESHVIR SINGH TOMAR v. DR. O. P. KOHLI & ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed a suit for declaration and possession holding that an unregistered and unstamped Agreement to Sell and an improperly stamped Power of Attorney cannot confer ownership rights under the amended Transfer of Property Act and Indian Stamp Act.
INDIA INFOLINE & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 409/406 IPC based on an amicable settlement at the investigation stage, imposing costs to compensate public resources.
Kamal Deep Singh & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Jugal Kishore Khanna v. The Swatantra House Building Society Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that procedural lapses in substituting legal representatives of a deceased plaintiff do not render a decree non-est if the parties had notice, setting aside the impugned order and remanding the matter for merits.
Daleep Singh Chandrawat v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of an official under the Official Secrets Act for unauthorized possession and attempted communication of secret defense documents, affirming statutory presumptions and validating recovery despite minor procedural lapses.