Search Judgments

Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name

Bharat Nathalal Kansara v. Praful Nathalal Kansara & Anr.

High Court of Bombay · 18 Oct 1993

The Court dismissed the Plaintiff's suit for recovery of money and possession, holding that the claim was barred by limitation and that the Plaintiff had only permissive possession surrendered validly without consideration under the 2001 MOU.

civil appeal_dismissed

Ramchandra Sitaram Supanekar and Ors. v. Uttamrao Yashwant Khot and Ors.

High Court of Bombay · 07 Oct 1993

The Bombay High Court set aside the MRT's order upholding tenancy rights, holding that the claimant failed to prove tenancy over disputed land due to lack of evidence of rent payment, mutation, and proper cultivation.

property appeal_allowed

Birma Devi and Ors. v. UOI and Anr

Delhi High Court · 10 Sep 1993 · 2025:DHC:760-DB

The Delhi High Court held that casual labourers granted temporary status but not regularised before retirement are entitled to pensionary benefits due to the employer's failure to regularise, overruling the denial of pension on procedural grounds.

labor appeal_allowed

M/S Kushal Infraproject Industries (India) Ltd v. Umed Singh (Deceased) ThrLrs & Ors

Delhi High Court · 03 Sep 1993 · 2018:DHC:8720-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against an interlocutory order closing the right to lead evidence, holding such orders are not appealable judgments under the Delhi High Court Act and CPC.

civil appeal_dismissed

Pilaji Sursinh Jadhavrao v. Regional Passport Office Pune

High Court of Bombay · 25 Aug 1993

The Bombay High Court held that passport reissuance cannot be granted during pending criminal proceedings without court permission, upholding statutory provisions and dismissing the writ petition.

constitutional petition_dismissed

G. Premjee Trading Private Limited v. Abdul Kader Haji Noormohammed & Ors.

High Court of Bombay · 26 Jun 1993

The Bombay High Court held that a sale agreement executed by a mother without legal guardianship under Mohammedan law is void as to minors, denying specific performance and granting refund of earnest money.

civil petition_dismissed

Dipak Arora & Anr v. Vijay Bhushan Arora & Anr

Delhi High Court · 04 Jun 1993 · 2016:DHC:5600-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld a decree for refund of Rs. 12 lakhs based on a written MOU, rejecting unparticularized fraud pleas and reducing interest to 8% per annum.

civil appeal_allowed

Central Board of Trustees (EPFO) v. M/S Era Infra Engineering Ltd.

Delhi High Court · 03 May 1993 · 2022:DHC:2137

The High Court held that while the principal employer is liable for PF dues of workers employed through contractors, the Adjudicating Authority must conduct proper enquiry and identify beneficiaries before assessment, and procedural fairness must be ensured in appellate proceedings.

administrative remanded

Jai Jalaram Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. v. M/s Nanji Khimji & Co. & Ors.

High Court of Bombay · 17 Apr 1993

The Bombay High Court allowed the writ petition directing grant of unilateral deemed conveyance under Section 11 of the MOFA Act, holding that the objector was estopped from denying the promoter's status and that title disputes can be agitated separately in Civil Court.

property appeal_allowed

Dr. Feroze Homi Duggan v. Bilkish Yunus Namakwala

High Court of Bombay · 04 Apr 1993

The Court revoked the fraudulent Letters of Administration granted to the Respondent based on a forged Will, affirming that no second grant can be made without revoking the earlier one and ordering inquiry into the fraud.

civil appeal_allowed

Dr. Feroze Homi Duggan v. Bilkish Yunus Namakwala

High Court of Bombay · 04 Apr 1993

The Bombay High Court revoked fraudulent Letters of Administration obtained by the Respondent over the estate of Lady Jena Duggan, holding the grant a nullity due to fraud and affirming the Petitioners' locus to seek revocation.

civil petition_allowed

Vilas Damu Shinde v. Special Land Acquisition Officer

High Court of Bombay · 04 Dec 1992

The Bombay High Court held that acceptance of Section 4(1) notice by one co-owner on behalf of others validates land acquisition, dismissing the petitioners' challenge but directing payment of interest on compensation.

property petition_dismissed

Parbhati Devi & Ors. v. State

Delhi High Court · 06 Nov 1992 · 2016:DHC:3979-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for cruelty under Section 498A IPC but acquitted the accused of murder under Section 302 IPC due to reasonable doubt arising from forensic and testimonial evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed

Parbhati Devi & Ors. v. State

Delhi High Court · 06 Nov 1992 · 2016:DHC:3976-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for dowry cruelty under Section 498A IPC but acquitted the accused of murder under Section 302 IPC due to insufficient evidence, modifying sentences to time served.

criminal appeal_allowed

Rohan Developers Pvt. Ltd. v. Income-tax Officer (International Taxation)-3

High Court of Bombay · 31 Aug 1992

The Bombay High Court held that for capital gains tax on property acquired by will, indexation benefit must be computed from the year the previous owner first held the asset, entitling the petitioner to refund of excess tax deducted at source with interest.

tax petition_allowed

Ali Mohd. Subrati Khan v. The State of Maharashtra

High Court of Bombay · 27 Aug 1992

The Bombay High Court upheld convictions for rape based on the credible sole testimony of the prosecutrix supported by medical and chemical evidence, affirming that absence of a test identification parade does not vitiate in-court identification.

criminal appeal_dismissed

Dinesh Kumar Singh & Ors. v. Sainath Education Trust & Ors.

High Court of Bombay · 26 May 1992

The Bombay High Court held that pay scale revisions for private school employees under the MEPS Act require statutory amendment of rules and cannot be effected solely by Government Resolutions, declining a larger Bench reference.

labor petition_dismissed

Usha Eswar v. Rajeshwari Menon & Ors.

High Court of Bombay · 29 Apr 1992

The Bombay High Court held that an advance ruling by the Authority for Advance Ruling is binding on the applicant and revenue unless law or facts change, and quashed reassessment notices issued relying on a subsequent ruling in another case without such change.

tax petition_allowed

National Building Construction Corporation v. M/s Sharma Enterprises

Delhi High Court · 02 Apr 1992

The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award except for the interest component, holding that judicial interference under Section 34 is limited and the contract barred pendente lite interest.

civil appeal_dismissed

Azizur Rehman Gulam Rasool v. M/s. Radio Restaurant

High Court of Bombay · 01 Apr 1992

The Bombay High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the arbitral award on grounds of procedural and substantive infirmities, upholding the award and directing possession to be handed over to the partnership firm.

civil appeal_dismissed