Search Judgments

Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name

Padmaja Pradip Walawalkar v. Sadanand Govind Bagave

High Court of Bombay · 31 Jul 2008

The Bombay High Court upheld the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal’s order setting aside tenancy rights claimed under Section 4(2) of the Tenancy Act due to failure to produce mandatory circumstantial evidence and petitioner’s admission of non-possession.

property appeal_dismissed

Mohd Nafish Khan & Ors v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors

Delhi High Court · 17 Jul 2008 · 2017:DHC:2574

The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging land conversion proceedings under the DLR Act, holding they were not barred by limitation and procedural requirements were met.

property petition_dismissed

Center for Research Planning and Action v. National Medicinal Plants Board Ministry of Ayush Government of India

Delhi High Court · 09 Jul 2008 · 2025:DHC:15-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and reinstated the arbitral award, holding that judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act is limited and the award by an expert arbitrator was not patently illegal or against public policy.

commercial_arbitration appeal_allowed

Badol Farazi v. The State

Delhi High Court · 02 Jul 2008 · 2016:DHC:3569-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Badol Farazi for murder and robbery, holding that credible eyewitness identification and recovery of incriminating evidence outweighed the appellant's alibi based on a passport issued after the offence.

criminal appeal_dismissed

National Leasing Limited v. The Assistant Commissioner of Income

High Court of Bombay · 30 Jun 2008

The Bombay High Court held that rental income derived by a company whose principal business is leasing properties is taxable as business income, not as income from house property, overruling the Tribunal's reliance on East India Housing.

tax appeal_allowed

Dr. Ashok K. Keshari v. Indian Institute of Technology

Delhi High Court · 27 Jun 2008 · 2021:DHC:294

The Delhi High Court upheld IIT Delhi's discretionary denial of HAG scale and Head of Department appointment to the petitioner based on objective performance criteria and administrative statutes, dismissing claims of arbitrariness.

administrative petition_dismissed

Paresh H. Mehta v. The Union of India

High Court of Bombay · 16 May 2008

The Bombay High Court quashed a 15-year-old show cause notice under the Customs Act due to inordinate and unexplained delay in adjudication and failure to comply with procedural requirements.

administrative petition_allowed

Binda Devi v. Dabboo Yadav @ Sanjeev Yadav

Delhi High Court · 24 Apr 2008 · 2016:DHC:6354

The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition upholding the Family Court’s order denying maintenance due to failure to prove a valid marital relationship between the parties.

family appeal_dismissed

Babita @ Pinki v. Sunil Sharma

Delhi High Court · 21 Apr 2008 · 2016:DHC:5726-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that customary divorce was not pleaded or proved and the second marriage was invalid as the first husband was alive at the time of marriage.

family appeal_dismissed

Mehboob Ayub Khan & Ors. v. Afzal Khan & Ors.

High Court of Bombay · 04 Apr 2008

The Bombay High Court held that a subsequent suit filed without prior leave under Order II Rule 2 CPC on the same cause of action is barred, and dismissed the High Court suit challenging a Will for non-compliance with mandatory procedural requirements.

civil appeal_allowed

Bhanuchandra J. Doshi v. M/s. Motilal Oswal Securities Ltd. & M/s. R. Natwarlal Parekh Securities P. Ltd.

High Court of Bombay · 18 Mar 2008

The Bombay High Court upheld arbitral awards under NSE bye-laws, holding the three-month deadline for awards is directory and rejecting claims of delay, back-dating, and unauthorized trades.

civil petition_dismissed

Ezajhussain Sabdarhussain v. State of Gujarat

Supreme Court of India · 29 Feb 2008

The Supreme Court acquitted appellants for murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC due to lack of evidence proving their common intention and participation in the crime.

criminal appeal_allowed

Narhari Chandrayya Kanda v. Heren Damji Gala

High Court of Bombay · 10 Feb 2008

The Bombay High Court affirmed that tenancy rights devolve on legal heirs absent eviction or surrender, and the Court of Small Causes has exclusive jurisdiction over tenancy and possession suits under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act.

civil appeal_dismissed

Neeta Shivaji Tekawade v. The Director; The State of Maharashtra

High Court of Bombay · 06 Feb 2008

The Bombay High Court held that the petitioner qualified for reservation under the sportsperson category as per the Government Resolution and quashed her appointment cancellation and related orders, directing reinstatement.

administrative appeal_allowed

Kripal Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Supreme Court of India · 04 Feb 2008

The Supreme Court upheld the murder conviction of Kripal Singh based on reliable ocular and medical evidence despite acquittal of co-accused, emphasizing cautious appraisal of evidence and rejecting rigid application of falsus in uno falsus in omnibus.

criminal appeal_dismissed

Kripal Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Supreme Court of India · 04 Feb 2008

The Supreme Court upheld the murder conviction of Kripal Singh based on reliable sole eyewitness testimony corroborated by medical and recovery evidence, rejecting the plea that acquittal of co-accused undermined his guilt.

criminal appeal_dismissed

The Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai v. Vidyavatidevi Ramnarayan Sahani

High Court of Bombay · 04 Feb 2008

The Bombay High Court upheld the quashing of a vague Section 354A notice issued by the Municipal Corporation for unauthorized repairs, emphasizing the mandatory requirement to pass a reasoned order upon receipt of a reply.

civil appeal_dismissed

Pravin Girish Chamaria & Nishit Bechar Patel v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

High Court of Bombay · 02 Feb 2008

The Bombay High Court held that disputes over apportionment of land acquisition compensation must be referred by the Land Acquisition Officer to the Civil Court, quashing the order directing disbursal to individual partners.

administrative appeal_allowed

Bharti Infratel Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax and Another

Delhi High Court · 31 Jan 2008 · 2019:DHC:282-DB

The Delhi High Court held that reassessment beyond four years under Section 147 is invalid if the assessee has fully and truly disclosed all material facts, and reopening on mere change of opinion is impermissible.

tax petition_allowed

Lovely Jogindersingh Sethi v. Nayeem Riyaz Khan & Ors.

High Court of Bombay · 30 Jan 2008

The Bombay High Court upheld eviction of tenant on grounds of bonafide requirement, default in rent, and nuisance, affirming applicability of Section 16(1)(g) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act and rejecting the tenant's challenge.

civil petition_dismissed