Search Judgments

Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name

Anil Kumar v. High Court of Delhi

Delhi High Court · 13 Jul 1938 · 2016:DHC:6804-DB

Delhi High Court partially allowed writ petitions challenging answer keys of the Delhi Higher Judicial Service Examination, correcting some answers, deleting ambiguous questions, and clarifying principles of judicial review and adverse possession.

administrative appeal_allowed

Anil Kumar v. High Court of Delhi

Delhi High Court · 13 Jul 1938 · 2016:DHC:6807-DB

Delhi High Court partially allowed writ petitions challenging answer keys of the Delhi Higher Judicial Service Examination, correcting certain answers and deleting ambiguous questions based on legal principles and precedents.

administrative petition_allowed

Anil Kumar v. High Court of Delhi

Delhi High Court · 13 Jul 1938 · 2016:DHC:6809-DB

Delhi High Court partially allowed writ petitions challenging answer keys of the Delhi Higher Judicial Service Examination, clarifying judicial review limits, correcting key answers, deleting ambiguous questions, and addressing related legal principles.

administrative petition_allowed

Nand Kishore v. DDA

Delhi High Court · 05 May 1938 · 2021:DHC:3857

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal seeking conversion of a temporary lease into a permanent lease over government-acquired land, holding that possession alone does not confer right to permanent lease absent a policy or obligation by the authority.

civil appeal_dismissed

Shri. Harilal Anurup Awadhia and Ors. v. Prabhakar Shravan Shinde

High Court of Bombay · 01 Nov 1928

The Bombay High Court upheld eviction of a tenant for unauthorized dominant residential use of commercial premises, clarifying that change of user alone suffices for eviction under Section 108(o) of the Transfer of Property Act and Section 13(1)(a) of the Bombay Rent Act.

civil petition_dismissed

Nand Kishore v. Dilshad Public School and Anr.

Delhi High Court · 24 Jul 1925 · 2022:DHC:5424

The Delhi High Court held that proceedings before a Conciliation Officer under the ID Act are conciliatory and not judicial, thus withdrawal of claims there does not bar filing an appeal under the Delhi School Education Act, and dismissal of such appeal for non-disclosure was erroneous.

labor appeal_allowed

Odeon Builders Pvt Limited v. Engineers India Limited

Delhi High Court · 03 Sep 1914 · 2020:DHC:2926

The Delhi High Court held that Engineers India Limited is a proper party to the arbitration agreement with Odeon Builders and appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.

arbitration petition_allowed