Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Gadam Hanumantha Rao v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed CISF to pay House Rent Allowance to a personnel permitted to live outside official accommodation but not provided government housing, following settled precedents upheld by the Supreme Court.
Rajesh Kumar v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that CISF personnel permitted to live outside official accommodation but not provided government accommodation are entitled to House Rent Allowance for the period of outdoor residence permission, following binding precedents upheld by the Supreme Court.
Manoj Kumar Yadav v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed CISF to pay House Rent Allowance to personnel permitted to reside outside official accommodation but not provided government accommodation, applying settled legal principles affirmed by the Supreme Court.
Kasani Sivaji v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that CISF personnel permitted to live outside campus without official accommodation are entitled to House Rent Allowance, directing payment for three years with adjustments and interest.
Mohit Kumar Roy v. Union of India & Anr.
Delhi High Court directs CISF to pay House Rent Allowance to personnel permitted to live outside official accommodation but not provided government housing, relying on binding precedents upheld by the Supreme Court.
Damor Ushabahen Ramabhai v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that CISF personnel permitted to live outside campus without official accommodation are entitled to House Rent Allowance for the period of such permission, directing payment to the petitioner accordingly.
Dibakar Kalita v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed CISF to pay House Rent Allowance to a personnel permitted to live outside official accommodation but not provided government married accommodation, relying on settled precedents upheld by the Supreme Court.
Junila Sonowal v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that CISF personnel permitted to live outside official accommodation without provision of married quarters are entitled to HRA, directing payment for three years with adjustments and interest.
Sharanappa v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking delayed payment of House Rent Allowance to CISF personnel on the ground of unexplained delay and laches.
Harsha Kaithwas v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition for House Rent Allowance due to unexplained delay and laches in filing the claim years after the entitlement period.
Amaresh v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking House Rent Allowance due to inordinate delay and laches, holding that stale claims without satisfactory explanation cannot be entertained.
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Deveshwari & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's finding of negligence and inclusion of future prospects in compensation, dismissing the insurer's appeal.
Kishan Suzi v. Budh Singh @ Malkit
The High Court allowed release of fixed deposit compensation funds for property purchase with safeguards, despite lack of prior tribunal permission.
Ravinder v. State
The Delhi High Court allowed parole to a life convict to file a Special Leave Petition, holding that convicts have a constitutional right to parole to prosecute higher court proceedings and parole cannot be denied without cogent reasons.
Nisha Priya Bhatia v. Ajit Seth & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that sexual harassment enquiry reports cannot be withheld on national security grounds without specific justification and directed their disclosure to the complainant.
Santosh Devi v. Union of India & Ors.
The Supreme Court upheld the denial of family pension to the widow of a Territorial Army personnel who died in disembodied state without completing minimum qualifying embodied service, but granted ex-gratia relief in the interest of justice.
State of Himachal Pradesh v. Rajiv Jassi
The Supreme Court restored the conviction of a husband for murdering his wife by forcibly administering poison, holding that the circumstantial and medical evidence conclusively proved his guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Satyendra Kumar v. Raj Nath Dubey
The Supreme Court held that res judicata applies only to factual issues in subsequent proceedings involving different properties, allowing courts to re-examine pure legal questions such as inheritance rights of illegitimate children.
Commissioner of Central Excise, Raigad v. M/s. Ispat Metallics Industries Ltd.
The Supreme Court upheld that transfers of inputs between sister companies without sale must be valued at the invoice value on which Cenvat credit was taken, excluding additional expenses, dismissing excise duty demands based on such additions.
Medical Council of India v. Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences
The Supreme Court held that expert inspection reports by the Medical Council of India are binding on courts, set aside the High Court's order allowing increased admissions at KIMS despite deficiencies, and emphasized the need for procedural fairness and regulatory compliance in medical education admissions.