Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Jitender Singh Sherawat & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable criminal FIR arising from matrimonial disputes under Section 482 Cr.P.C. following an amicable settlement between the parties, emphasizing prevention of abuse of process and securing ends of justice.
Kuldeep @ Deepak & Anr v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable dowry-related FIR under Section 482 Cr.P.C. following an amicable settlement between the parties, emphasizing the court's inherent power to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice in matrimonial disputes.
Ramandeep Singh & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable criminal FIR under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on a mutual settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Anita @ Ruby v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 21(c) NDPS Act for possession of heroin, ruling that minor procedural lapses and delay in sending samples to FSL do not vitiate the prosecution case if the chain of custody is intact and no tampering is shown.
K.S. Bist v. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition holding that the claim for pay revision and arrears was barred by limitation under Section 21 of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985, regardless of the merits.
P. C. Meena v. North DMC and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the dismissal of a contempt petition, holding that subsequent directions modified earlier orders and repetitive contempt petitions are not maintainable.
Angoori Devi v. State
The Delhi High Court set aside the murder conviction of the brother-in-law in a dowry death case due to unreliable dying declaration and lack of specific evidence implicating him.
K. Parama Sivan v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that CISF personnel permitted to live outside official accommodation without government quarters are entitled to House Rent Allowance for the relevant period, directing payment with interest if delayed.
G. Sreenivasa Rao v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court directed CISF to pay House Rent Allowance to personnel permitted to live outside official accommodation but not provided government housing, following settled legal precedent upheld by the Supreme Court.
Alka Sangita Kujur v. Union of India & Anr.
Delhi High Court directs CISF to pay House Rent Allowance to personnel permitted to live outside official accommodation but not provided government housing, following binding precedents affirmed by the Supreme Court.
Kharadi Ashok Bhai Mangalaji v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that CISF personnel permitted to live outside official accommodation without provision of government accommodation are entitled to House Rent Allowance for the relevant period, following binding precedents upheld by the Supreme Court.
Ramesh Singh Yadav v. Union of India & Anr
Delhi High Court directs CISF to pay House Rent Allowance to personnel permitted to live outside official accommodation when government accommodation is not provided, following binding precedents upheld by the Supreme Court.
Naresh Kumar v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed CISF to pay House Rent Allowance to personnel permitted to live outside official accommodation but not provided government housing, following settled precedent upheld by the Supreme Court.
Amar Nath v. Union of India & Anr
Delhi High Court directs CISF to pay House Rent Allowance to personnel permitted to live outside official accommodation but not provided government housing, following settled precedents affirmed by the Supreme Court.
Arpita Halder v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court directed CISF to pay House Rent Allowance to a personnel permitted to live outside official accommodation but not provided government housing, applying settled precedents upheld by the Supreme Court.
Surjit Kumar Ray v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that CISF personnel permitted to live outside official accommodation without provision of married quarters are entitled to House Rent Allowance, directing payment to the petitioner accordingly.
Brijendra Ahirwar v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that CISF personnel permitted to live outside official accommodation without provision of government married quarters are entitled to House Rent Allowance for the relevant period, directing payment with adjustment of any prior compensation.
Vandana Kumari v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that CISF personnel permitted to live outside official accommodation without provision of government married accommodation are entitled to House Rent Allowance for the relevant period, following settled precedents affirmed by the Supreme Court.
Dusmanta Nath v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed CISF to pay House Rent Allowance to personnel permitted to live outside official accommodation when no government accommodation is provided, following settled legal precedent upheld by the Supreme Court.
Bharat Kumar v. Union of India & Anr
Delhi High Court directs CISF to pay House Rent Allowance to personnel permitted to live outside official accommodation but not provided government married accommodation, following binding precedents upheld by the Supreme Court.