Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Harbir Lakra v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable criminal FIR arising from a matrimonial dispute based on an amicable settlement between the parties under its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Harbir Lakra & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Section 498-A IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Deepak Malik v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of three accused for gang rape, emphasizing the credibility of the victim's testimony corroborated by call records and forensic evidence under Section 376(2)(g) IPC.
Deepak Malik v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of three accused for gang rape of a minor, relying on credible victim testimony corroborated by forensic and circumstantial evidence, and rejected challenges based on procedural lapses and minor inconsistencies.
Harbir Lakra v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable FIR under Section 324 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Ajay Sapra v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 448, 454, 323, 392, 397, and 380 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Gaurav Kaushik v. C.B.I.
The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail to the petitioner accused of unauthorized deletion in MCD's e-tendering system, emphasizing the necessity of custodial interrogation for effective investigation.
Marvel Farm Products Private Limited v. Knowledgeage Technologies Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Amalgamation without convening meetings of shareholders and creditors as all parties consented and no creditors existed.
Alok Awasthi v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed officers on study leave to occupy government accommodation without market rent until 31.07.2016, holding that restricting them to only HRA was justified given accommodation constraints but reasonable time to vacate must be granted.
MC Consulting Engineers Private Limited v. Technocrats Advisory Services Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Arrangement and Demerger under the Companies Act, 1956 after ensuring procedural compliance and absence of objections.
Teva API India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld an ex-parte injunction against generic manufacturers, emphasizing the need for expeditious disposal of interim applications and recognizing Section 107A's exemption for regulatory submissions in patent infringement suits.
ABB India Limited v. Isolux Corsan India Engineering & Construction & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Section 9 petition for lack of territorial jurisdiction due to an exclusive jurisdiction clause conferring jurisdiction on Gurgaon courts, holding that such clauses override arbitration venue clauses.
ExlService SEZ BPO Solutions Private Limited v. Exl Service.com (India) Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation of two transferor companies into a transferee company under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, allowing dissolution without winding up and directing compliance with statutory requirements.
Neeraj @ Gofanda v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence of the appellant for robbery at knife point under Section 397 IPC and Section 27 Arms Act, rejecting claims of false implication and affirming the complainant's credible testimony.
KRISHAN COLONY WELFARE ASSOCIATION v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court quashed the land acquisition declaration and held the acquisition notification lapsed for the petitioners' lands, relying on prior binding precedent.
Basiullah v. State
The Delhi High Court modified the appellant's conviction from murder under Section 302 IPC to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part I IPC, reducing the sentence to eight years' imprisonment, holding the killing occurred in a sudden fight without premeditation.
Sushil Kumar Gupta v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation remains unpaid for over five years, even if possession was taken.
Ms. Indrani Ghosh with Ms. Nidhi Jacob, Advocates v. MANAGING COMMITTEE ST. ANGELS SCHOOL & ORS. .....
The Delhi High Court allowed teachers to appoint a suspended employee as their Defence Assistant in disciplinary proceedings, directing expeditious inquiry in line with departmental notification.
Charan Das v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings predating the 2013 Act lapse if compensation is unpaid within five years, but compensation under the 2013 Act must be paid to retain possession of utilized land.
Laljinder Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation remains unpaid for over five years from the award date.