Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Rosary Senior Secondary School v. Directorate of Education & Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order setting aside the termination of a school teacher due to procedural irregularities and violation of natural justice in disciplinary proceedings.
Dr. Jyoti Golani v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court restored the Tribunal’s order granting a dental doctor the benefit of enhanced superannuation age of 65 years with retrospective effect, holding that review jurisdiction was misused and parity among government doctors mandates equal treatment.
Rakesh Kumar v. Narender Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal upholding ex parte possession and rent decree against the tenant, affirming procedural rules on recall and review petitions.
Esha Mehta v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court accepted an unqualified apology from the Special Executive Magistrate and disposed of the contempt writ petition against him.
Mahendra Singh v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed the habeas corpus petition seeking production of a woman who was found to have married of her own free will and whose age was medically assessed to be near majority.
Alcatel-Lucent India Limited v. The Designated Authority & Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging anti-dumping duty notifications, holding that the petitioners must exhaust the statutory appellate remedy before CESTAT despite pendency of appeals.
Mohan Rai v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court acquitted appellants convicted for murder and robbery due to failure of prosecution to establish a complete chain of circumstantial evidence beyond reasonable doubt.
Ravi Gupta v. Brij Bhushan Sharan
Property tax recoverable from tenant under NDMC Act does not form part of rent under Delhi Rent Control Act unless agreed, and cannot be added to rent to deny tenant protection or justify eviction.
Deepak Malik v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of three accused for gang rape, affirming that credible victim testimony corroborated by medical and circumstantial evidence suffices for conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC.
Priya Hiranandani Vandervala v. Niranjan Hiranandani & Anr.
The Delhi High Court clarified that courts where the cause of action lies and where arbitration is seated have concurrent jurisdiction under the Arbitration Act, and exclusive jurisdiction under Section 42 vests in the court first seized of a bona fide application.
Reefer Gen Infotech Private Limited v. Renewable Power Venture Private Limited
The Delhi High Court approved a Scheme of Arrangement involving amalgamation and demerger without convening shareholder and creditor meetings, as all parties had given written consent and no objections.
Kasuya GPP Auto Products Private Limited v. Ghaziabad Precision Products Private Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed the application to dispense with convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for approving a Scheme of Amalgamation between a wholly owned subsidiary and its holding company based on unanimous written consents.
Kashi Vishwanath Steels Private Limited v. Galwalia Ispat Udyog Private Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed a joint application under the Companies Act to dispense with meetings of equity shareholders and unsecured creditors while directing meetings of secured creditors for approval of a Scheme of Arrangement, dispensing with newspaper notice publication due to the small number of secured creditors.
Manoj Sehrawat v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of the accused in a murder case, holding that serious allegations supported by circumstantial evidence and refusal to participate in identification proceedings preclude grant of bail at the trial stage.
Great Learning Management Private Limited v. Beacon Higher Education Services Private Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed a Scheme of Amalgamation between a wholly owned subsidiary and its holding company, dispensing with meetings and separate petitions under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 based on unanimous consents.
Emaar MGF Land Limited v. MGF Developments Limited
Delhi High Court directed convening of meetings of shareholders and creditors to consider a Scheme of Arrangement for demerger, dispensing with certain creditor meetings whose liabilities were not presently due.
IIDC Limited v. IL&FS Township & Urban Assets Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed the application to dispense with meetings of equity shareholders and secured creditors and directed convening a meeting of unsecured creditors for approval of a Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956.
Preeti Sehgal v. Sarla Sehgal
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the partition decree of the estate of late Sh. N.L. Sehgal, affirming equal shares for legal heirs and rejecting unsubstantiated claims of misappropriation.
Nano Electrotech Private Limited v. Infopower Technologies Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Arrangement merging Nano Electrotech Private Limited into Infopower Technologies Limited under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956, dissolving the transferor company without winding up.
Raj Kumar Vij v. Kotak Mahindra Bank & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a purchaser with possession and full payment under an agreement to sell prior to mortgage creation has a protectable interest and can redeem the property on terms similar to other owners in debt recovery proceedings.