Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Devinder Singh v. Government of NCT Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court directed the government to verify and take time-bound action against encroachments on Gram Sabha and forest lands, treating the PIL as a representation.
Komal Khichar v. Indian Council of Agricultural Research
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking admission to postgraduate veterinary courses due to the petitioner’s college lacking recognition by the Veterinary Council of India and consequent inability to produce a valid registration certificate.
State (GNCT of Delhi) v. Jai Kishan @ Jony & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the discharge of accused under Section 313 IPC for miscarriage due to insufficient medical evidence corroborating the allegations at the charge framing stage.
Attar Singh v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking preservation of the Investigating Officer's mobile call data, holding that such disclosure would intrude on the officer's privacy and is not warranted in the present criminal case.
SILVER RESORTS HOTEL INDIA PVT. LTD. v. WIMBERLY ALLISON TONG & GOO (UK)
The Delhi High Court upheld an international commercial arbitral award, dismissing the petition to set it aside for alleged procedural irregularities and conflict with public policy, affirming limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
PKH v. Central Adoption Resource Authority
Delhi High Court held that inter-country direct adoptions under HAMA, 1956 do not require CARA's NOC and directed CARA to grant the NOC for issuance of passport to the adopted child.
Rakesh Kumar v. UOI & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the disciplinary trial and dismissal of a BSF constable for trespassing and intoxication, ruling that remanding for evidence and trial after a plea of guilt is lawful under BSF Rules.
Water Carrier Daya Dhar Prasad v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a BSF employee for molesting a child, ruling that procedural lapses did not vitiate the conviction supported by sufficient evidence and that the penalty was proportionate to the offence.
Nishad Sharma v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting to consider and act on the petitioner's complaint regarding banned Pakistani channels broadcast by Dish TV within three months, ensuring due process.
Timken India Limited v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that timely renewal of Status Certificate is mandatory for eligibility under the Target Plus Scheme, and procedural delay cannot be condoned in absence of explicit policy provision.
Nitin @ Lucky Rana v. State N.C.T of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case involving alleged obstruction and assault on a police official, holding that custodial interrogation was unnecessary and the petitioner was willing to cooperate.
Ajay Shankar Mathur & Anr v. Rama Mathur (Late) Thr Ler Lr Vijay Shankar Mathur
The Delhi High Court held that the right to sue survives the death of a plaintiff in a suit based on title to property, validating impleadment of legal representatives without adjudicating the Will's validity at that stage.
Joginder Singh v. Rekha Gupta & Ors.
The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the dismissal of a review application under the SARFAESI Act, holding that the petitioner failed to establish bona fide tenancy and that the CMM lacked jurisdiction to review its order.
Malik Mohd Tanveer v. Uzma Malik & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a suit for mandatory injunction against a licensee is maintainable without seeking possession and must be valued for court fees under the provisions applicable to injunction suits, not based on the market value of the property.
Anterjit Kaur v. Col. Rajinder Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court’s order impleading the petitioner as a necessary party in a suit for recovery of possession, holding that her presence is essential for complete adjudication given her claim of ownership and possession.
Suman Lata v. Amit Kumar and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld that a Will granted absolute ownership to the appellant and her husband, but the respondent inherited a co-ownership share by intestate succession, dismissing the appellant's suit for possession.
Gunesh Kumar v. State
The Delhi High Court set aside the conviction under the NDPS Act due to lack of independent witnesses, procedural lapses, and inconsistencies in prosecution evidence, granting the appellant benefit of doubt.
Ajay v. State (GNCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for possession of 161.200 kg of ganja under the NDPS Act, affirming that consistent police testimony and procedural compliance suffice to prove possession despite absence of independent witnesses.
Nyaya Manch v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a PIL seeking action against unauthorized constructions by directing authorities to treat the petition as a representation and act in accordance with earlier judicial directions within eight weeks.
Ved Pal v. Deepak Mohan Spolia
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking directions for drainage and sewage facilities in an illegal colony, holding that contempt proceedings cannot extend beyond enforcing the original order for cleaning a village pond.