Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Anam Khan v. Consortium of National Law Universities
The Delhi High Court directed correction of disputed CLAT PG 2024-25 answer keys, upheld the Consortium's objection fee for now but advised reconsideration, balancing examination integrity with candidates' rights.
Jaiprakash Hyundai Consortium v. SJVN Limited
The Delhi High Court held that DRB recommendations on claims up to ₹5 crores constitute immediately enforceable arbitral awards under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and dismissed the appeal against refusal to enforce the award as time barred.
Tata Capital Limited v. Rishab Sharma
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, holding that the court's role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and must not decide the dispute's merits at this stage.
SUSTAINABLE ENGINEERING AND FARMING ALLIANCE PRIVATE LIMITED v. UMA SHANKAR SAHU
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that judicial scrutiny at this stage is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement, leaving substantive disputes to arbitration.
Ankit Kasana v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the accused in a sexual assault case, holding that a consensual relationship and prior settlement indicated false implication, subject to conditions to safeguard investigation.
Neelima Chadha v. Jatinder Talwar Alias Mickey Talwar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's interim maintenance order of Rs.15,000 per month, ruling that foreign income must be assessed considering cost of living and the petitioner's earning capacity.
Krishan Kumar Bansal v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the Supreme Court's review ruling that DRI officers are proper officers under the Customs Act, validating their show cause notices and proceedings, and directed restoration of notices for adjudication with appeals to CESTAT.
Saroj Bala Gupta v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that interest on delayed retiral benefits must be paid from the date such benefits became due, rejecting financial hardship as a ground to deny past interest.
Sunil Kumar Dhaiya v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 29, Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that a notice under Section 148 issued for AY 2014-15 after a search conducted post 31.03.2021 is barred by limitation when computed from the date of reassessment initiation, setting aside the notice accordingly.
TATA SKY LIMITED v. S G ENTERPREISES – TATA SKY SALES AND SERVICES AND ORS.
The Delhi High Court directed comprehensive compliance and procedural measures to address unauthorized domain name registrations infringing trademarks and clarified roles of banks and associations in preventing misuse of brand names in banking identifiers.
SUSTAINABLE ENGINEERING AND FARMING ALLIANCE PRIVATE LIMITED v. SOMNATH RANGNATH PARVE
The Delhi High Court held that at the Section 11 stage, the Court's role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate employment-related disputes.
Greatech Fashions v. S K Industries
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that the recovery suit was barred by limitation despite COVID-19 period exclusion, as no fresh acknowledgment or part payment was made to extend limitation.
Mr. Amit Singh v. Sh Dheeraj Pal
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's petitions and upheld the Tribunal's order directing extension of MACP and pensionary benefits to similarly situated personnel based on binding precedent and principles of parity.
Pooja Mehta & Ors. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an eviction order under the Senior Citizens Act for failure to issue mandatory show cause notice, emphasizing harmonization of rights under the DV Act and Senior Citizens Act.
Tarun Kumar & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a valid settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process.
Anil Kumar Vats v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court acquitted appellant Anil Kumar Vats of murder charges due to lack of evidence of common intention, upheld acquittal of other accused, and affirmed the admissibility and reliability of CCTV and hostile witness testimony.
Sh. Kunal Aggarwal & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes on the ground of amicable compromise and withdrawal of prosecution by the complainant.
Mrs Rupinder Kaur & Anr. v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR on the ground of an unconsented compromise and refused protection from arrest to proclaimed offenders with pending bail applications.
Prabhakar Kabra v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking FIR registration for alleged Provident Fund violations and wrongful termination, holding the dispute to be civil and not warranting criminal investigation.
Vinod @ Babli & Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR for mutual assault under Section 110/3(5) of BNS following compromise between parties, subject to payment of costs.