Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Samir Sharma & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that an order passed without affording the petitioner an opportunity of personal hearing violates natural justice and remitted the matter for fresh decision after hearing.
The Chairman (S.S.C.) v. Ajay Mehra
The Delhi High Court held that a candidate lacking a recognized three-year graduation degree as per UGC regulations is ineligible for SSC Combined Graduate Level Examination, setting aside the CAT's order reinstating such candidature.
EX.CT.DHARAM PAL v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld dismissal of a BSF constable for intoxication on duty and leaving post without orders, affirming charge reframing and consideration of past service record in penalty determination.
Union of India v. Hardy Exploration & Production (India) Inc.
The Delhi High Court lacks jurisdiction under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act to set aside an arbitral award made at the foreign seat of arbitration, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
M/S ALLIED BLENDERS & DISTILLERS PVT LTD v. R.K. DISTILLERIES PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court lacks territorial jurisdiction to entertain a trademark and copyright infringement suit where the plaintiff's principal office and cause of action lie elsewhere, despite the plaintiff having a branch office in Delhi.
Lahmeyer International (India) Private Limited v. Tractebel Engineering Private Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed the application to dispense with convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for approving a Scheme of Amalgamation where majority consents were obtained under Section 391(1) of the Companies Act, 1956.
Justice For All v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed review petitions challenging its order enforcing Supreme Court directions that unaided schools allotted land by DDA cannot increase fees without prior approval of the Director of Education, affirming the binding nature of the Supreme Court's ruling under Article 141.
Mukesh Kumar v. UOI and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that CRPF personnel who are primary caregivers of differently-abled children are entitled to exemption from routine transfers and suitable postings to facilitate care and rehabilitation of their children.
Mukesh Kumar v. UOI and Ors.; Anil Kumar v. UOI and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that CRPF personnel who are caregivers of differently-abled children are entitled to exemption from transfers or postings at locations with family accommodation to ensure continuous care, subject to administrative feasibility.
Tinna Rubber and Infrastructure Limited v. Tinna Trade Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed the application to dispense with the meeting of equity shareholders of the resulting company and directed convening of separate meetings of shareholders and creditors to consider and approve a Scheme of Arrangement involving demerger and merger under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956.
Mohinder Kumar Sukhija v. Ramesh Kumar Sukhija & Ors.
The High Court dismissed the petition for default and non-prosecution due to the petitioner's repeated absence and lack of interest in prosecuting the case.
M/S HILTI INDIA PVT LTD v. M/S SEVEN HILLS HEALTHCARE (P) LTD
The Delhi High Court dismissed a civil suit as withdrawn after the parties settled and the plaintiff received the agreed payment.
Govindan Soman v. Atam Prakash Malik & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's second appeal, upholding the respondents' title and possession rights based on valid pre-2001 documents and rejecting unsubstantiated tenancy claims.
Lepakshi Emporium & Ors. v. Employees State Insurance Corporation
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and remanded the matter for fresh consideration of whether a State exemption under the Employees State Insurance Act applies to a Delhi branch based on the functional integrity test.
Narain Vegetable Products Private Limited v. HFM Logiware Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between Narain Vegetable Products Private Limited and HFM Logiware Private Limited under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, dissolving the transferor company without winding up.
GI Executive Solutions Private Limited v. Elixir Web Solutions Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956, dissolving the transferor companies without winding up, after finding no objections and compliance with statutory requirements.
Mallet Properties Private Limited; Alight Advisory Services Private Limited; Suprava Agro Estates Private Limited v. Bahri Estates Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, allowing three transferor companies to merge into a transferee company, dissolving the transferors without winding up.
Legend Travels Private Limited v. Legend Travel Solutions Private Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Arrangement involving demerger and merger under the Companies Act, 1956, after finding compliance with statutory requirements and no objections.
SMS Iron Technology Private Limited v. SMS India Private Limited
Delhi High Court allowed a joint application under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956, dispensing with meetings of equity shareholders and secured creditors and directing meetings of unsecured creditors for approval of a Composite Scheme of Arrangement involving amalgamation and demerger.
PTL Enterprises Limited v. Artemis Global Life Sciences Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed the application to dispense with convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for sanctioning a Scheme of Arrangement where all parties had given their consent in writing.