Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co Ltd v. Pramod Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the compensation awarded for permanent disability including future prospects in a motor accident claim and modified the disbursement mechanism to protect the claimant's financial interests.
Rajesh Khanna v. National Agricultural Co-operative Marketing Federation of India Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award based on a comprehensive settlement, rejecting appellants' claims of non-adjudicated counter claims, wrongful interest, and invalid modification, affirming limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
Union of India v. Manmohan Juneja
The Delhi High Court directed the Central Administrative Tribunal to expeditiously hear and dispose of the stay application, without expressing any opinion on the merits, emphasizing avoidance of unnecessary adjournments.
Rajesh Khanna v. National Agricultural Co-operative Marketing Federation of India Ltd.
The court held that sale of attached leasehold immovable property without court permission constitutes contempt, dismissed the appeal but reduced the sentence from six to three months imprisonment.
Hindustan Industrial Products Proprietor Anand Kumar Gupta v. Directorate General of Central Excise Intelligence & Anr.
The Delhi High Court modified DGCEI's conditions for provisional release of seized goods, allowing release upon furnishing a bond for full assessment value and payment of duty without requiring a 25% bank guarantee.
BHARATSANCHARNIGAMLTD. & ORS v. SH. RAKESHKUMAR
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing BSNL to reconsider the respondent's compassionate appointment application in accordance with the scheme and legal precedents.
Pr. Commissioner of I.Tax- Delhi-2 v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeals, upholding the ITAT's deletion of additions to book profit for deferred government grants and bond issuance expenses under Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act, relying on Supreme Court precedent.
Pr. CIT Central-3 v. Brijwasi Impex Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed Revenue's appeals, holding that assessments under Section 153A require incriminating material and upheld ITAT's deletion of additions based on valuation and explanation of cash deposits.
PR. Commissioner of I. Tax-Delhi-2 v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's interpretation that Section 80-IA(2A) allows full deduction of profits and gains of telecommunication undertakings without requiring the profits to be "derived from" the business, dismissing the Revenue's appeals.
YASH PROMOTERS & BUILDERS PVT LTD v. SATYAWATI SHARMA
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to set aside an arbitral award due to the petitioner's failure to show sufficient cause for condoning a 169-day delay in re-filing beyond the statutory limitation period under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd. v. JT. Commissioner of Income Tax
The Delhi High Court held that a bona fide and debatable difference on the applicability of TDS provisions constitutes reasonable cause to set aside penalty under Section 271-C for failure to deduct tax at source.
Kalindi College v. Kishore Kumar
The Delhi High Court held that the principal employer must pay compensation to injured workmen or their heirs but can recover the amount from the contractor under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923, directing release of compensation and clarifying rights of indemnity.
Kalindi College v. Kishore Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the principal employer is liable to pay compensation to injured or deceased workmen but can recover the amount from the contractor under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923 and the contract.
Kalindi College v. Kishore Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the principal employer (Kalindi College) must pay compensation to injured workmen but can recover the amount from the contractor under the Workmen’s Compensation Act and contract terms.
Mathews J. Nedumpara v. The Supreme Court of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the Supreme Court's collegium system judgment is binding under Article 141 and dismissed the challenge to judicial appointments made under it.
Union of India v. Prem Chand Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's quashing of a delayed and vague charge memo against a BSNL officer, holding that unexplained delay causing prejudice and absence of prima facie misconduct justify quashing disciplinary proceedings.
Akash Chadha v. Preeti Khanna
The Delhi High Court held that maintenance pendente lite under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act can continue after dismissal or withdrawal of the main matrimonial petition until disposal of the maintenance application.
Rajesh v. State
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of rape and criminal intimidation charges, holding that DNA evidence alone cannot substitute proof of absence of consent required under Section 376 IPC.
COL K S MEHTA (RETD) v. PRABHU DAYAL MEENA & ANR
The court dismissed the petition alleging violation of interim orders, holding that the petitioner was not entitled to continue sponsorship beyond the contract period or prescribed age limit, and accepted the respondents' apology for inadvertent error.
COL. K.S. MEHTA v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking extension of DGR sponsorship beyond age 63 and without a satisfactory performance certificate, upholding the age limit and certification requirements under the governing Office Memorandum.