Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Vinod Kumar & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the pay fixation of Railway Protection Force constables must be at the minimum entry pay of Rs. 6460 as per the Revised Pay Rules, directing payment of arrears accordingly.
The United India Insurance Co Ltd v. Rubina & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the motor accident compensation award including future prospects, dismissing the insurer's plea of contributory negligence by the deceased.
Kaushal Jain & Ors. v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from a property dispute under its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. following an amicable settlement between the parties to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Pawan Kumar Bansal & Ors. v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from a family property dispute under its inherent powers in Section 482 Cr.P.C. following an amicable settlement between the parties.
Parminder Kaur v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld bail granted to the accused in a case involving delayed and improved allegations of rape, emphasizing the need to consider overall facts and infirmities in the prosecution's case.
Satbir Singh Chahal & Anr. v. State of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from a matrimonial dispute under Section 482 Cr.P.C. based on an amicable settlement, emphasizing the sparing exercise of inherent powers to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.
Subhash Chander v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a CISF constable for unauthorized overstay of leave, rejecting his medical justification and holding the penalty proportionate and justified.
Vinod Kumar @ Vicky v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 384, 506, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Exide Technologies v. Exide Industries Ltd. and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld Exide India's registered trademark rights over 'EXIDE' in India, dismissing Exide US's appeal and affirming that validity challenges must be pursued before the IPAB, not civil courts.
Praveen Bhutani v. Madan Mohan Sethi & Anr
Delhi High Court allowed substitution of a legatee relying on an unprobated Will under Order 22 Rule 4 CPC with a rider protecting natural heirs’ rights, holding probate is not mandatory in Delhi for enforcing a Will.
Nikhil v. Chinmaya Vidyalaya & Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed a petition preventing cancellation of a minor’s school admission based on a disputed caste certificate, permitting continuation under the verified Economically Weaker Section category.
Ananya Singh v. Central Board of Secondary Education
The Delhi High Court held that CBSE cannot restrict re-evaluation rights to certain subjects by circular when its Bye-laws permit re-evaluation generally, and directed re-evaluation of the petitioner's Political Science answer sheet.
Victory Electricals Ltd v. GE Capital Services India
The Delhi High Court held that a future dispute arising after a final arbitral award can be referred to arbitration anew and appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate the petitioner’s claims under the arbitration clause.
National Agriculture Co-Operative Marketing Federation of India Ltd. v. Sikka Promoters Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld a decree on admissions holding that misdescription of auctioned property constituted a mutual mistake voiding the contract and barred forfeiture of earnest money.
Metal Box India Limited v. T. K. Sehgal & Sons (HUF) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition, holding that the rent issue was res judicata and that recalling witnesses for further cross-examination after evidence closure is not permissible under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC except for clarifications.
M/S SARV WEBS PVT LTD v. M/S STAR RURAL BUS LINKS
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner liberty to seek review of the trial court's dismissal of their application to frame additional issues on territorial jurisdiction, holding that dismissal under Order VII Rule 11 CPC is not a final adjudication on jurisdictional questions where an ouster clause is pleaded.
Amit Vyas & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable criminal FIR under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Metpark Datatech Pvt. Ltd. v. Genins India TPA Ltd.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition for appointment of a sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising from multiple agreements between the parties, holding that such clubbing is permissible for efficient arbitration.
M/S VENUS HOME APPLIANCE (P) LTD v. M/S SUJIT KANORIA & ANR
The High Court allowed the petitioner to file a belated Power of Attorney authorizing representation in a suit, holding that a company can ratify authority to sign pleadings expressly or impliedly even after suit commencement.
Guru Teg Bahadur Institute of Technology and Ors. v. All India Council for Technical Education & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld AICTE's refusal to grant admission approval to petitioners due to non-compliance with norms and strict adherence to the Supreme Court's admission schedule, dismissing interim relief to admit students.