Search Judgments

Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name

Sunny @ Yogesh v. The State (Govt. of NCT), Delhi

Delhi High Court · 05 Sep 2016 · 2016:DHC:6284

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeals of Sunny @ Yogesh and Naresh, upholding their criminal convictions based on proper appreciation of evidence and absence of procedural irregularities.

criminal appeal_dismissed

Sunny @ Yogesh v. The State (Govt. of NCT), Delhi

Delhi High Court · 05 Sep 2016 · 2016:DHC:6285

The Delhi High Court dismissed the criminal appeals of Sunny @ Yogesh and Naresh against their convictions in terms of a detailed common judgment in a related case.

criminal appeal_dismissed

Imtiyaz @ Tinku v. The State (NCT of Delhi)

Delhi High Court · 05 Sep 2016 · 2016:DHC:6283

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence of three appellants for robbery and related offences based on credible victim identification, corroborative medical evidence, and recovery of the crime weapon.

criminal appeal_dismissed

M/ S. K. S. S. Petron Pvt. Ltd. v. M/S. Gypsum Structural India Pvt. Ltd.

Delhi High Court · 05 Sep 2016 · 2016:DHC:6281

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award holding that disputes arising from a Letter of Intent supplementing a Work Order fall within the arbitration clause, affirming the Arbitrator's jurisdiction and dismissing the petition to set aside the award.

civil petition_dismissed

Rewati Prasad & Anr v. Union of India & Ors

Delhi High Court · 05 Sep 2016 · 2016:DHC:6280-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging repatriation orders, granting salary only for the period of interim protection and directing sympathetic consideration of posting representations.

administrative petition_dismissed

Rewati Prasad & Anr v. Union of India & Ors

Delhi High Court · 05 Sep 2016 · 2016:DHC:6282-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging repatriation orders but directed payment of salary for the period of interim protection granted during the service dispute.

administrative petition_dismissed

Abhay Jain v. Delhi State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Ors

Delhi High Court · 05 Sep 2016 · 2016:DHC:6310

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 288, 337, and 304-A IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal petition_allowed

Rambhool Singh v. State & Anr.

Delhi High Court · 05 Sep 2016 · 2016:DHC:6308

The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition upholding the conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, affirming that admitted cheque signatures and dishonour create a presumption of legally enforceable debt.

criminal appeal_dismissed

Rajinder Prasad v. State of Delhi & Anr.

Delhi High Court · 05 Sep 2016 · 2016:DHC:6306

The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition upholding the conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act where the petitioner admitted the cheque signature but failed to rebut the presumption of issuance for discharge of a legally enforceable debt.

criminal petition_dismissed

Alka & Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Delhi High Court · 05 Sep 2016 · 2016:DHC:6305

The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable FIR under Sections 324, 341, 506, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal appeal_allowed

Kanta Jindal v. Rasik Gupta

Delhi High Court · 05 Sep 2016 · 2016:DHC:6302

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking recall of the complainant under Section 311 Cr.P.C. in a cheque dishonour case, holding that the accused was given adequate opportunities and cannot prolong the trial by belated applications.

criminal petition_dismissed

Anoj Menon v. The State of NCT & Anr.

Delhi High Court · 05 Sep 2016 · 2016:DHC:6303

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 406, 420, and 120-B IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal appeal_allowed

Pankaj Verma v. State & Anr.

Delhi High Court · 05 Sep 2016 · 2016:DHC:6309

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under multiple IPC sections based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal appeal_allowed

Nand Kumar Jha v. Mohar Kumar Jha

Delhi High Court · 05 Sep 2016 · 2016:DHC:6307

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking forensic examination of cheques in a Section 138 NI Act complaint, holding that such examination is not warranted when signatures are undisputed and would cause undue delay.

criminal petition_dismissed

Vipin Gulia v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

Delhi High Court · 05 Sep 2016 · 2016:DHC:6304

The Delhi High Court held that police investigation and FIR registration in a non-cognizable offence are lawful if prior Magistrate's permission under Section 155 Cr.P.C. is obtained, and quashing of FIR is not maintainable after framing of charge and recording of evidence.

criminal petition_dismissed

Edgeclife Developers LLP v. Southend Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.

Delhi High Court · 05 Sep 2016 · 2016:DHC:9356

The Delhi High Court granted summary decree for recovery of share application money with statutory interest against a company that failed to allot shares and dishonoured refund cheques.

civil appeal_allowed

Standard Chartered Bank & Anr. v. Directorate of Enforcement

Delhi High Court · 05 Sep 2016 · 2016:DHC:9125

The Delhi High Court quashed the Enforcement Directorate's order for failure to consider prior judicial decisions and directed a fresh hearing with a reasoned order.

administrative appeal_allowed

Ashok Pandit v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr

Delhi High Court · 05 Sep 2016 · 2016:DHC:9124

The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking quashing of an FIR under Section 307 IPC, holding that allegations prima facie disclosing an offence cannot be quashed at the initial investigation stage under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal petition_dismissed

Sampati Devi v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation

Delhi High Court · 05 Sep 2016 · 2016:DHC:8436-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeals as withdrawn with liberty to seek review of the impugned order regarding the non-functionality of the Town Vending Committee under Order 47 CPC.

civil appeal_dismissed

Ashwani Kausmik v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)

Delhi High Court · 05 Sep 2016 · 2016:DHC:8311

The Delhi High Court dismissed bail applications as infructuous following the prior quashing of the FIR against the petitioners.

criminal appeal_dismissed