Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Dharam Dass Chorasia v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging seniority fixation of CRPF officers relegated to a subsequent training batch due to service-attributable injury, holding the petitions barred by delay and non-impleadment of affected parties, and upheld seniority rules under Standing Order No. 01/2009.
Newgen IT Technologies Limited v. Newgen Software Technologies Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld the ex-parte ad-interim injunction restraining the Appellant from using marks similar to the Respondent's registered trademarks, affirming the trial court's discretionary order as lawful and not perverse.
RSPL Health Pvt. Ltd. v. Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging refusal of interim injunction in a trademark dispute, holding no likelihood of confusion between distinct goods despite similar marks and affirming bona fide prior user rights.
Manvir Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner’s Bipolar Affective Disorder is attributable to BSF service and directed grant of disability pension with interest, rejecting objections of delay and jurisdiction.
R. Santosh v. ONE97 Communications Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the decree for recovery of a security deposit where the defendant failed to file a written statement or challenge the plaintiff's evidence, and held that belated arbitration application was not maintainable.
Shabir Ahmed Shah v. National Investigation Agency
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's bail plea in a terrorism-related conspiracy case under the UA(P) Act, holding that prima facie evidence of involvement in secessionist activities justified denial of bail.
Ashok Kumar v. State
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of theft charges due to contradictions, unexplained FIR delay, and unreliable prosecution evidence despite conviction based on a solitary witness.
Shakila v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that no further judicial inquiry was warranted into the custodial death of an inmate and that siblings and their children are not eligible dependents for compensation under the Delhi Victims Compensation Scheme.
Singhania & Shashank Shekhar v. K.M. Shukla & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing release of retiral benefits after quashing a belated recovery demand for unauthorized occupation, emphasizing due process and regularization of service period.
Union of India & Anr. v. Shilpi Gupta
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's order directing regularization of long-serving ad-hoc stenographers appointed after valid selection, emphasizing the primacy of continuous service and constitutional fairness over mere nomenclature of appointment.
Subodh Jha and Ors v. Union of India and Anr
The Delhi High Court held that CAPF Medical Officers constitute an Organized Group 'A' Service and are entitled to Non-Functional Financial Upgradation benefits as per the Sixth Central Pay Commission, directing the government to grant such benefits with effect from 2006.
Rakesh Mahadu Dandekar & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra
The High Court set aside murder convictions due to unreliable discovery evidence and defective confession, emphasizing strict procedural compliance and benefit of doubt.
Amit Chandole v. Directorate of Enforcement
The High Court held that a Magistrate must apply judicial mind before accepting a 'C' Summary Report and that committal of scheduled offences to the PMLA Special Court under Section 44(1)(c) can only occur after cognizance of the offence is taken, setting aside premature committal and acceptance orders.
Sucheta Desmond Rodrigues v. The Bombay Presidency Golf Club Limited
The Bombay High Court held that wards appointed as legal dependents are entitled to enjoy club membership privileges as dependent children, rejecting the club's claim of misrepresentation and interpreting its bye-laws to include wards as dependents.
Sucheta Desmond Rodrigues v. The Bombay Presidency Golf Club Limited
The Bombay High Court held that a golf club was estopped from denying installment payment of membership fees after accepting such payments and that termination of membership on grounds of non-payment and non-submission of golf scorecards was unjustified and malafide.
Himanshu Khanna & Anr. v. Rajeev Khanna & Anr.
The High Court upheld the trial court's jurisdiction and refusal to dismiss the probate petition under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, holding that probate courts cannot examine title and that territorial jurisdiction exists if any property lies within the court's jurisdiction.
Raju Sardana v. Pawan Arya & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the right of a co-owner to transfer her undivided share in unpartitioned property under Section 44 of the Transfer of Property Act, dismissing the petitioner’s challenge to a compromise settlement for specific performance.
Mohd Yamin v. Mohd Hasam
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's refusal to reject a suit for injunction based on wrongful possession despite absence of a specific declaration prayer, emphasizing that cause of action must be judged on the plaint's averments without evidence at the threshold.
Vinay Dua v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi; Raj Kumar Agarwal v. State of NCT Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted bail to accused in a commercial quantity NDPS case, holding that disclosure statements of co-accused require corroboration and mere financial or communication links do not bar bail under Section 37 of the NDPS Act.
Ravinder Bhuiyan v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to an accused charged under Section 18 of the NDPS Act involving commercial quantity of narcotics, emphasizing that prolonged incarceration and procedural lapses in recovery justify bail despite statutory restrictions.