Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Pradeep Bailey v. Gilma Daniel
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file additional documents belatedly under Order 7 Rule 14 CPC, emphasizing that procedural rules should not obstruct substantive justice when no prejudice is caused.
Pradeep Bailey v. Gilma Daniel
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file additional documents belatedly under Order 7 Rule 14 CPC, emphasizing that procedural rules should not override substantive justice when no prejudice is caused.
Board of Control for Cricket in India v. Kochi Cricket Private Limited
The Bombay High Court allowed BCCI's challenge to arbitral awards in IPL franchise disputes, holding that the awards were patently illegal and contrary to contract terms, and emphasized strict compliance with contractual obligations and arbitration procedures.
M/s. Bob Capital Markets Ltd. v. The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
The High Court held that providing free dining facilities and self-service vending machines for employees without any commercial trade does not attract licensing requirements under Section 394 of the MMC Act and quashed the criminal process issued against the applicant.
State of NCT of Delhi v. Neeraj Kumar @Sunil
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal against bail granted under MCOCA, holding that despite imperfect application of statutory bail conditions, prolonged incarceration and trial delay justified bail under Article 21.
State of NCT of Delhi v. Satish Kumar Mandal
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's petition for leave to appeal against acquittal in a POCSO case due to inconsistencies in the prosecutrix's testimony and lack of corroborative evidence.
State NCT of Delhi v. Umesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's petition for leave to appeal against acquittal under Section 489C IPC, holding that the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case due to contradictions and lack of evidence of intent to use counterfeit currency as genuine.
Kuber Boddh v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of an application under Section 319 CrPC for summoning an additional accused due to lack of strong and cogent evidence, emphasizing the discretionary and stringent nature of such power.
State GNCT Delhi v. Shiv Mohan
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's petition for leave to appeal against acquittal in a sexual assault case due to inconsistencies in the prosecutrix's testimony and unexplained delay in FIR registration.
Chaman Lal v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the authorities to reconsider a transfer order challenged on medical and family grounds by passing a reasoned order, granting interim relief to the petitioner.
Jyoti C. Raheja and others v. Aasia Properties Development Ltd. and others
The High Court upheld the CLB's findings on shareholding date and pre-emption rights, set aside equitable relief for board nomination, and clarified the scope of jurisdiction under Sections 397 and 402 of the Companies Act, 1956.
Jyoti C. Raheja and others v. Aasia Properties Development Ltd. and others
The Bombay High Court upheld the CLB's findings on shareholding dates and right of pre-emption, rejected claims of record manipulation and oppression, and set aside the CLB's order allowing Aasia Properties to nominate a director, emphasizing strict statutory interpretation and jurisdictional limits.
Sundyne Pumps and Compressors India Pvt Ltd v. The Union of India
The Bombay High Court held that supplies by an Indian company to its foreign group companies qualify as export of services under GST and the petitioner is entitled to refund of unutilized ITC, rejecting the department's agency-based denial.
Abhay Damodar Kanhere v. Morya Infraconstruct Pvt. Ltd
The Bombay High Court held that disputes under a sale agreement containing an arbitration clause are arbitrable despite RERA jurisdiction, and jurisdictional issues must be decided by the arbitral tribunal, not at the Section 11 stage.
Sashidhar Jagdishan v. State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court held that under Section 223 of B.N.S.S., notice to the accused must be issued only after recording verification of the complainant and witnesses, quashing the Magistrate's premature notice issuance.
Dr Aditi Panwar v. National Board of Examinations in Medical Sciences and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed NBEMS to convert a vacant OBC reserved DNB Post Diploma seat under All India Quota to unreserved category and allot it to the petitioner to prevent wastage of medical seats.
M/s Global Impex v. M/s Sipping Tea Cinemas LLP
The Bombay High Court granted interim injunctions under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act to protect the petitioner’s assigned rights in the movie Charak pending arbitration, holding the Agreement to be a present assignment and the petitioner ready to perform.
Balasaheb Maruti Baswant v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court upheld the conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC where the appellant set his wife on fire, rejecting claims of suicide and applicability of Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC.
Tarakant Sangwani v. Supreme Industries Limited
The Delhi High Court disposed of the appeal with directions for expeditious hearing and disposal of the respondent's interim application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 CPC without expressing any opinion on the merits.
Rubel Abbasi v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted interim bail to the accused in an NDPS case on humanitarian grounds due to his wife's scheduled surgery, subject to bond and surrender conditions.