Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Suresh Chand & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to treat the writ petition as a representation and pass a reasoned order within four weeks, disposing of the petition accordingly.
GEM SALES CORPORATION v. SHIVAM CORPORATION INDIA
The Delhi High Court dismissed the commercial appeal as withdrawn, granting liberty to the appellant to initiate appropriate proceedings due to non-maintainability under Section 13A of the Commercial Courts Act and Order XLIII CPC.
Rajmani v. Union of India & Anr.
The court disposed of the writ petition with a direction to reconsider the petitioner's representation on posting with reasons for any rejection, while requiring the petitioner to report to the posting immediately.
Tridib Mondal v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that street vendors with valid Certificates of Vending must comply with conditions including non-encroachment of public spaces and may not be disturbed if compliant, dismissing the petition challenging removal and confiscation by MCD.
M/S GS Marbles v. M/S Shree Granites
The Delhi High Court upheld a decree for recovery against a defendant who failed to file a Written Statement within the statutory 120-day period, affirming the mandatory nature of procedural timelines under Order VIII CPC.
Hambir Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld that furlough cannot be granted during pendency of appeal before the Supreme Court under Note 2 to Rule 1224 of the Delhi Prison Rules, applying the principle of derogation of power from K.M. Nanavati, while recognizing furlough does not suspend sentence.
Budhi Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that furlough cannot be granted during pendency of appeal before the Supreme Court as it would derogate appellate powers, interpreting 'High Court' in prison rules to include the Supreme Court and upholding the constitutional validity of the bar on furlough during such pendency.
Jaykishor Chaturvedi v. Securities and Exchange Board of India
The Supreme Court upheld SEBI's authority to levy retrospective interest on unpaid penalties from the date of adjudication orders under Section 28A of the SEBI Act read with Income Tax Act provisions, dismissing the appellants' challenge to recovery proceedings.
Neethu B. @ Neethu Baby Mathew v. Rajesh Kumar
The Supreme Court allowed review of its earlier custody order based on new psychological evidence, restoring permanent custody to the mother while granting the father visitation rights to protect the child's best interests.
G. Kalawathi Bai v. G. Shashikala
The Supreme Court held that a power-of-attorney holder executing a document does not become its executant for registration purposes and must comply with authentication requirements under the Registration Act, 1908, overruling the contrary view in Rajni Tandon.
Vijay Kumar v. Central Bank of India
The Supreme Court held that reduction of pension on compulsory retirement requires prior consultation with the Board of Directors under Regulation 33 of the Central Bank of India Pension Regulations, and set aside the pension reduction order for lack of such consultation.
Kattavellai @ Devakar v. State of Tamil Nadu
The Supreme Court set aside the appellant's conviction and death sentence in a double murder case due to unreliable circumstantial evidence, weak confession, and faulty investigation.
M/S TORINO LABORATORIES PVT. LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA
The Supreme Court upheld the clubbing of two pharmaceutical companies as one establishment under the EPF Act based on cumulative factors of unity in management, finance, premises, and purpose, dismissing the appellant's challenge.
Pradeep Bhardwaj v. Priya
The Supreme Court granted divorce on the ground of irretrievable breakdown of marriage under its constitutional power, overturning lower courts' rejection despite unproven cruelty allegations.
Krishan Gopal v. Gurmeet Kaur & Ors.
The Supreme Court upheld specific performance of a land sale agreement, invalidated subsequent sale deeds executed pendente lite, and affirmed the court's power to grant possession suo motu under the Specific Relief Act.
PNB Housing Finance Limited v. Manoj Saha
The Supreme Court held that possession taken under SARFAESI Act is valid against unregistered tenancy claims lacking evidence, and High Courts should not interfere where alternate statutory remedies exist.
G. MOHANDAS v. STATE OF KERALA
The Supreme Court upheld criminal proceedings against a building owner and municipal officials for conspiracy to illegally construct a commercial building in a prohibited zone, rejecting the plea for quashing based on subsequent regularisation.
L. Muruganantham v. State of Tamil Nadu & Others
The Supreme Court upheld enhanced compensation for illegal arrest and police harassment of a disabled prisoner while dismissing claims against prison authorities, emphasizing the need for systemic reforms to ensure rights and accommodations for prisoners with disabilities.
Patel Engineering Ltd. v. Acron Developers Pvt. Ltd.
The Bombay High Court upheld the arbitral award in a construction contract dispute, rejecting the petitioner’s challenge on grounds of coercion, additional claims, delay, and invocation of bank guarantees.
Seema Sureshchandra Mehata & Ors. v. Marvel Realtors & Developers Limited & Ors.
The Bombay High Court allowed the writ petition directing the civil court to execute the RERA possession order expeditiously, holding that procedural non-compliance cannot defeat substantive justice and imposed costs on the developer for delaying possession.