Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Harihar Prasad v. Docbel Industries
The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Labour Court Award for non-prosecution after the petitioner settled the dispute and expressed his intention to withdraw the petition.
Nirmal Gupta v. Ram Niwas Gupta
The Delhi High Court held that revision petitions against interlocutory orders of Commercial Courts are barred under Section 8 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, and Article 227 jurisdiction is to be exercised sparingly to uphold legislative intent.
Alpro Industries and Anr v. Indo Alusis Industries Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that revision under Section 115 CPC is not maintainable against interlocutory orders that do not finally dispose of the suit, dismissing the petition challenging the rejection of additional documents.
Susheel Saxena v. M/S I.C. Technologies Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that revision under Section 115 CPC is not maintainable against interim orders that do not finally dispose of the suit, dismissing the petition accordingly.
Rajeev Vinod Khosla v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in an NDPS case holding that the quantity of contraband recovered from him cannot be clubbed with that of co-accused without cogent evidence of conspiracy, as the petitioner possessed only an intermediate quantity below the commercial threshold.
Zakey Ahmed v. State of NCT Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in an NDPS case due to total non-compliance with mandatory procedural safeguards under Section 42 of the NDPS Act, emphasizing that the officer who first receives secret information must personally reduce it into writing.
Saurabh Chauhan & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce.
Ganesh v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 354-A IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would serve no useful purpose.
Saurabh Kumar @ Sagar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed enhancement of compensation to Rs. 1,60,000 under Rule 3(3) of the Railway Accidents and Untoward Incidents (Compensation) Rules, 1990, for serious injuries causing pain and suffering, condoning delay in filing the appeal.
Piyush Goyal v. Om Prakash
The Delhi High Court held that the appellate court must first decide the appeal against the suit's rejection before seeking a status report from the municipal authority regarding alleged unauthorized construction.
Soni Gupta v. Gaurav Garg
The Delhi High Court directed the Family Court to reconsider the allocation of Local Commissioner expenses in divorce proceedings, especially given the pending maintenance application of the wife.
Arpit Mishra v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a serious offence case due to material contradictions, delay, and lack of corroborative evidence, emphasizing bail as the norm and jail the exception.
Durgesh Kumar v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a rape case, holding that consent given on a promise to marry made after the start of a consensual relationship does not vitiate consent under Section 376 IPC.
Ability Dodzi @ Chinazom Ability v. State NCT of Delhi
The High Court dismissed the petition challenging an interlocutory order summoning the Investigating Officer and refused to interfere with the pending application for preservation of CCTV footage, holding that revisional jurisdiction under Section 438(2) BNSS does not extend to interlocutory orders.
Mohd. Sajid @ Benam v. The State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence of the appellant for aggravated penetrative sexual assault on a child, affirming that consistent and corroborated child testimony suffices for conviction under the POCSO Act despite minor contradictions.
Ms. X v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Abhishek Paruthi
The Delhi High Court allowed DNA testing of the accused in a rape case under Sections 53/53A Cr.P.C., overruling the presumption of legitimacy under Section 112 Indian Evidence Act, emphasizing the primacy of scientific evidence in criminal investigations.
Yashu Chugh v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279 and 338 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement and the complainant's unwillingness to pursue prosecution.
Nitin and Another v. The State and Another
The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act due to amicable settlement and reconciliation between the parties.
M Sambasiva Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's conviction in a corruption case due to unreliable trap evidence, contradictions, and failure to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt, reinstating the Trial Court's acquittal.
Sunita & Ors. v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that a driver with an LMV license can drive a commercial vehicle under 7500 kg and that the Insurance Company must indemnify the claimant under the "Pay and Recover" principle despite policy breach, enhancing compensation awarded.