Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Ningbo Aux Imp and Exp Co Ltd v. Amstrad Consumer India Pvt Ltd
The Bombay High Court held that a foreign arbitral award cannot be enforced against a non-party to the arbitration proceedings and vacated disclosure orders against such non-party, directing their deletion from the enforcement petition.
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd v. M/S Interweave Fashions (P) Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that the Insurance Surveyor's report is not binding on consumer fora and refused to interfere under Article 227 with the consumer commission's order awarding full fire insurance claim and compensation.
Amit v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court refused to interfere with a transfer order of a government employee despite his wife's medical condition, reaffirming that transfer decisions are administrative and not subject to judicial interference absent mala fide or arbitrariness.
Amit Kumar Yadav v. The State
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to Amit Kumar Yadav in a serious kidnapping and robbery case, emphasizing presumption of innocence, doubtful evidence, and humanitarian grounds.
Pardeep Pradhan v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to a former police officer accused of kidnapping and robbery under Section 364A IPC, emphasizing the need to prove essential ingredients beyond reasonable doubt and considering humanitarian grounds.
State of NCT of Delhi v. Jawahar Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a sexual assault case due to material contradictions in the victim's testimony and lack of evidence for house trespass and criminal intimidation.
M/S SERVOTECH POWER SYSTEMS LIMITED v. VIVEK SINGHAL
The Delhi High Court granted leave to withdraw the appeal filed by M/s Servotech Power Systems Limited and disposed of the appeal as withdrawn, vacating any interim orders.
E. R. Squibb and Sons, LLC & Ors. v. Zydus Lifesciences Limited
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction restraining Zydus Lifesciences from commercializing a biosimilar of Nivolumab, holding the suit patent valid and prima facie infringed.
Aman Yadav alias Gaurav & Anr. v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita based on an amicable settlement between the parties, reaffirming the Court's power to prevent abuse of process of law.
Pankaj Pandey @ Ashutosh Pandey v. State of (NCT) of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354D and 506 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, affirming the court's power to end criminal proceedings to prevent abuse of process.
Avinash Suri & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, applying the principle that continuation of criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process.
Col Rajesh Singh Gaur & Anr. v. Nityanand Gautam & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted the defendants one final opportunity to cross-examine the plaintiff witness in a possession suit, subject to costs, despite their defence being struck off and the plaintiff's evidence closed.
Pramod Kumar v. State N.C.T of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of a truck driver for rash and negligent driving causing death but reduced his sentence to the period already served, granting leniency as a first-time offender.
Vikram Singh v. State Through Subhash Place Police Station
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a cheating and criminal conspiracy case involving disputed financial transactions and documentary evidence, emphasizing the need to prevent undue harassment in absence of clear incriminating evidence.
Abhay Singh v. Airports Authority of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a non-tenure transfer order, holding that transfers made in accordance with transfer policy and accepted by the employee are not subject to judicial interference absent mala fide or policy violation.
NEXIM EXPORTS PVT LTD & ANR. v. B B PATEL & ANR.
The High Court held that revision under Section 115 CPC is not maintainable against interlocutory orders in execution proceedings and dismissed the petition accordingly.
MINOSHA INDIA LIMITED v. MR. DEEPAK TIWARI & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that revision petitions under Section 115 CPC are barred against interlocutory orders of Commercial Courts by Section 8 of the Commercial Courts Act, and constitutional jurisdiction under Article 227 must be exercised sparingly in such cases.
Suresh Malhotra v. Ballabh Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging non-impounding of insufficiently stamped documents, allowing the petitioner to seek appropriate relief before the trial court without delaying cross-examination.
Krishan Kumar Mishra v. Annu Goyal
The Delhi High Court directed the Trial Court to expeditiously decide the jurisdictional challenge under Order VII Rule 11 CPC and kept the Order XVA CPC order in abeyance pending such adjudication.
Santosh Devi v. Naveen Kumar
The High Court granted the plaintiff a final opportunity to lead remaining evidence despite prior closure of evidence by the Trial Court, balancing delay concerns with the right to a fair trial.