Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Jagdish Lal Sachdeva v. Dharam Singh & Ors.
The High Court allowed the petitioner to lead evidence afresh after the Trial Court prematurely closed his evidence due to the absence of his counsel.
Mohd. Samar v. Waseem Ahmed & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that in execution objections, the issue must focus on whether the objector is bound by the decree and has independent possession rights, directing re-casting of issues and dismissal of the supervisory petition.
Usha Shriram Enterprise Pvt Ltd & Anr. v. Ajeet Singh
The Delhi High Court allowed belated filing of the written statement with costs, directing the trial court to proceed, emphasizing procedural discipline balanced with substantive justice.
Shri Brij Behari Sharan v. Sanjay Malhotra
The Delhi High Court held that eviction petitions for slum-notified premises require prior permission under Section 19 of the Slum Areas Act and that eviction applications against successors must be filed before the Trial Court, granting liberty to landlords to move fresh applications if pending appeals succeed.
Rambeti v. Pandit Ram Kishan Sharma
The Delhi High Court allowed the tenant's petition permitting summoning of additional witnesses to dispute landlord's ownership in an eviction case based on bona fide requirement.
Pranav Ansal v. Vipin Malhotra & Anr.
The Delhi High Court recalled non-bailable warrants issued against a non-party individual in execution proceedings and emphasized adherence to procedural safeguards despite directions for expeditious disposal.
Ravinder Kumar Luthra v. Election Commission of India and Anr
The Delhi High Court directed the Central Administrative Tribunal to consider the petitioner's interim relief application within a specified timeframe, disposing of the writ petition without expressing any opinion on merits.
Ankit Goyal v. Narcotics Control Bureau
Anticipatory bail was denied to the petitioner in a commercial quantity NDPS case due to failure to satisfy mandatory Section 37 conditions, non-cooperation, and necessity of custodial interrogation.
Bharat Sharma & Ors. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process of law.
Naresh Kumar @ Pahelwan v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to an accused under MCOCA due to prolonged pre-trial detention and acquittal in predicate offences, emphasizing the constitutional right to a speedy trial over stringent statutory bail conditions.
Malkhan v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed parole to a life convict, holding that parole cannot be denied solely on the gravity of offence or past unsatisfactory conduct when recent conduct is satisfactory and address verification issues can be managed by jail authorities.
Parvinder@Devender v. The State (Govt of NCT, Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a case of attempted murder and arms offences, considering the stage of trial, victim examination, and lack of evidence in other cases against him.
Virender@Kalu v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused after five years of incarceration due to weak evidence on identity and his acquittal or bail in other cases.
Amardeep Soni & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking quashing of FIR and proceedings in a family property dispute case, holding that inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC must be exercised sparingly and that disputed facts require trial.
Khushi Ram @ Rajeev & Ors. v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act based on a voluntary amicable settlement and mutual divorce, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process.
Saddab Akhtar & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, emphasizing the court's power to prevent abuse of process in matrimonial disputes.
Sh. Mahender Sharma & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings under multiple IPC sections based on an amicable settlement between parties and absence of victim's objection, applying Section 528 BNSS and Article 226 of the Constitution.
Rakesh Kumar Sharma v. Shrish Dutt
The Delhi High Court restored the defendant’s struck-off defence upon payment of costs and permitted revival of plaintiff’s application under Order XI Rules 12 and 14 CPC, directing expeditious trial disposal.
Dr. Er. Rajainderr Jaina v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the Registrar of Companies to treat the writ petition as a representation, provide hearing to the petitioner regarding alleged fake resignation and removal as director, and pass a detailed speaking order within a stipulated time.
Nisheeth Kohli v. Sonal Malik
The High Court held that orders under Section 23 of the Domestic Violence Act are challengeable only by appeal under Section 29 of the Act and dismissed the petition for want of maintainability.