Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Ritu Sharma v. Kailash Chand and Anr
The High Court upheld the execution of a possession decree against a judgment debtor, holding that a purchaser of the property during the pendency of the suit cannot resist execution under the doctrine of lis pendens.
Brigadier Balwant Dahiya Trust v. Shakuntala Dahiya and Ors
The High Court granted defendant no. 5 one final opportunity to produce a witness despite earlier closure by the Trial Court due to non-service of summons.
Casablanca Apparels Pvt Ltd v. Polo/ Lauren Company L.P.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the condonation of delay application and consequently the commercial appeal filed beyond the prescribed limitation period, holding that the appellant failed to demonstrate sufficient cause under the Limitation Act, 1963 and Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
Sansadiya Adhikari Welfare Society v. Utpal Kumar Tripathi & Ors.
A welfare society acquiring land for residential development for members qualifies as a promoter under RERA and must comply with its provisions including pre-deposit requirements.
Sonu S/O Shri Ben Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for sexual offences against a child under IPC and POCSO Act, affirming the reliability of the child victim's testimony and rejecting the appeal despite minor discrepancies in timelines.
Vipin Gupta v. The State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that a compromise with legal representatives of a deceased victim cannot be a ground to quash an FIR under Sections 279/304A IPC, rejecting the petition and allowing criminal proceedings to continue.
Rihan Khan @Dulare v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of an accused charged with abetment to suicide and dowry harassment, relying on the suicide note and supportive testimony of the deceased's parents.
Deepak Mishra v. The NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a serious harassment and sexual offence case, emphasizing the right to speedy trial, delay in FIR registration, contradictions in prosecution evidence, and absence of risk of tampering.
Qamar Ikbal v. State (GNCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of an accused alleged to have facilitated a large-scale cyber cheating racket by providing bank accounts, holding that custodial detention was necessary at the investigation's initial stage.
Vikas Kumar Singh v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the lawful towing and seizure of a vehicle parked in a public place under the 2024 Delhi Guidelines and directed its release upon compliance with prescribed procedures.
Seema Rani & Ors. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed temporary de-sealing of petitioners' shops to enable rectification of unauthorized constructions, with subsequent inspection and consideration for permanent de-sealing by the MCD.
Ravi v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Tribunal's order directing a Review DPC to be conducted as per rules, holding no grievance arose from the Tribunal's disposal without impleading the petitioner.
Poonam Narula & Anr. v. Brahm Lal
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking to admit irrelevant title documents executed by the plaintiff in favor of third parties during the pendency of an appeal in a possession suit.
Sheru Gupta and Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 506, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, applying the principle that continuation of criminal proceedings would be unjust and an abuse of process.
Jagdish v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted the petitioner a one-week parole on conditions, recognizing recent good conduct despite prior punishments, to assist his family in relocating their house.
Mukesh Kumar Bhardwaj v. Gauri Shankar & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the refusal to admit documents on record due to suppression of prior withdrawal of an application, emphasizing litigant diligence and full disclosure under Section 151 CPC.
Ajay Kumar Maurya v. Suraj Chaudhary & Ors.
The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the refusal to implead the defendants' father as a necessary party in a recovery suit based on an agreement to sell, holding that belated impleadment without sufficient justification is not permissible.
Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Raj Kumar Goel
The High Court refused to interfere with the Trial Court's order closing the defendant's right to file a written statement without condonation of delay, directing the Trial Court to decide the pending application under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC before passing any decree.
Anijay Tyagi v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted the petitioner additional time to comply with demolition directions due to medical grounds, allowing filing of a regularization application and directing expeditious consideration by the MCD.
Umri Pooph Pratappur Tollways Pvt. Ltd. v. M.P. Road Development Corporation
The Supreme Court upheld the exclusive jurisdiction of the Madhya Pradesh Arbitration Tribunal under the 1983 Act over disputes arising from works contracts involving the State, dismissing arbitration proceedings initiated under the 1996 Act as impermissible.