Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Kawal Mahajan v. Unitech Fibres Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the Commercial Court's dismissal of a suit for recovery of payment, holding that acceptance of debit notes and failure to timely dispute claims of short supply or defects precluded recovery.
Asahi India Glass Pvt Ltd v. Advantage India Logistics Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award granting damages for loss of profit due to termination of transportation agreements without mandatory 30-day notice, emphasizing limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
CRODA INC v. THE CONTROLLER OF PATENTS
The Delhi High Court allowed the patent applicant's appeal and remanded the matter for fresh consideration after holding that reliance on undisclosed prior art in the refusal order violated natural justice.
Chandan Prajapati; Shailendra Kumar Mishra; Falguni Rai v. Jitendra Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order deeming the employee's voluntary retirement effective after three months due to the employer's failure to refuse within the prescribed period, rejecting the employer's contention that disciplinary penalties barred retirement.
M/S Satya Parkash and Brothers (P) Ltd. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the setting aside of an arbitral award on the ground that a sole arbitrator appointed unilaterally by one party, ineligible under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration Act, violates public policy and cannot be waived except by express written agreement after dispute arises.
Shri Pankaj Aggarwal v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the disciplinary removal order and CAT dismissal for lack of reasons, discriminatory penalty, and failure to consider the petitioner’s criminal acquittal, remanding the matter for fresh consideration.
Staff Selection Commission & Anr. v. Pankaj Shakya
The Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's order directing a fresh medical examination, upholding consistent medical findings that the respondent was unfit due to carrying angle exceeding prescribed limits.
Pushpendra v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to challenge the impugned order before the Tribunal and suggested expeditious disposal of the matter.
Gian Singh v. Sh Suresh Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that interim orders are not amenable to revision under Section 115 CPC and dismissed the petition challenging an order directing temporary utility connections.
Mohd. Abbas v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court refused to direct the Central Administrative Tribunal to expedite hearing of petitioners' cases, holding that such matters are to be decided by the Tribunal itself without judicial interference.
Saurabh Sharma v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to hear and decide the petitioner's complaint under Section 246 of the Companies Act, 2013 by passing a reasoned speaking order after affording a fair opportunity of hearing.
Puneet Singh v. Nupur Pal & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against contempt conviction for wilful disobedience of a settlement order, upheld the Supreme Court's dismissal of the related SLP, and took serious note of the litigant's non-disclosure of the Supreme Court order.
PL Vasudeva v. ML Sharma & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal as abated and for non-prosecution due to the appellant’s failure to bring legal heirs on record and inordinate delay in substitution application without sufficient cause.
Rama Motor Services Pvt Ltd v. Commissioner State Goods and Services Tax & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the petitioner to file an appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act against an ex-parte order, deferring the validity of the impugned notification to the Supreme Court’s pending decision.
RAMA MOTOR SERVICES PVT LTD v. COMMISSIONER STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX & ANR
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order for failure to grant proper hearing and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, leaving the validity of the impugned notification open pending Supreme Court decision.
Santosh Kumar Pandey v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court set aside ex-parte GST demand orders due to improper communication of Show Cause Notices and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication with opportunity to be heard, leaving the validity of the underlying notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.
MS Phoolchand Harikishan v. The Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Services Tax & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order due to improper notice via the GST portal and remanded the matter for fresh hearing, leaving the validity of related notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.
Rama Motor Services Pvt Ltd v. Commissioner of State Goods and Service Tax Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order for failure to afford a proper hearing, remanding the matter for fresh consideration while leaving the validity of the impugned notification open pending Supreme Court decision.
Hind Paper House v. The Commissioner State Goods and Service Tax Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside a GST demand order passed without proper hearing due to initial non-uploading of documents, directing a fresh hearing after valid service of the Show Cause Notice.
Kailashpati Polyplast Pvt Ltd v. Raghav Industries
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's challenge to the trial court's refusal to admit a late-filed Section 65B certificate under Section 311 Cr.P.C., holding that procedural discretion must be exercised judiciously and not to fill lacunae after final arguments.