Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Shri Desh Raj Arya & Ors. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking to declare land acquisition proceedings lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act due to delay, possession taken, and compensation paid, holding that relief is not available to occupants of unauthorized colonies awaiting regularization.
Jorawar Singh Through Lrs. v. Mother Dairy Fruit and Vegetable Ltd
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition to set aside the impugned award and granted the petitioner one last opportunity to cross-examine the respondent's witness, emphasizing the requirement of fair opportunity under natural justice.
M/S LGF SYSMAC (INDIA) PRIVATE LTD. v. M/S SHALIMAR ENGINEERS
The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff's appeal, holding that downloaded bank statements are admissible evidence for proving payment in a suit for refund of advance where the defendant failed to supply goods and did not contest the suit.
M/S KURLON LTD v. PANAMA POLY PRODUCTS PVT. LTD
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against a money decree for unpaid goods, holding that failure to produce documentary proof and statement of account justified adverse inference and upheld the trial court's decree.
Ram Bhawan Upadhyay v. UOI & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an employee is entitled to provident fund dues from the CMPF reserve account despite employer default and absence of records, rejecting delay and laches as a bar.
Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv with Mr.Gulshan Chawla, Adv. v. PRADEEP MEHRA .....
The Delhi High Court held that an employee entitled to better gratuity terms under contract is not bound by the statutory ceiling under Section 4(3) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, and the Controlling Authority has jurisdiction to adjudicate claims exceeding that ceiling.
Deepali Chugh v. Managing Director (South Asia) M/s. Turner International India Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a Labour Court Award, holding that acceptance of retrenchment compensation and awarded amounts estops the petitioner from contesting the legality of termination despite delayed payment.
M/S APEX METALLOYS PVT. LTD v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by M/s Apex Metalloys Pvt. Ltd. by referring to the detailed judgment in a similar case, M/s Standard Metalloys Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors., dated 06.02.2019.
M/S RVG METALS AND ALLOYS PVT. LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by M/s RVG Metals and Alloys Pvt. Ltd. by referring to the detailed judgment in a related case involving similar parties and issues.
M/S RVG MINERALS AND METALS PVT. LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by M/s RVG Minerals and Metals Pvt. Ltd. by referring to the detailed judgment in a related writ petition dated 06.02.2019.
M/S STANDARD METALLOYS PVT. LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court held that the Administering Authority under the OAMDR Act lacks power to annul granted exploration licenses without due process, setting aside the impugned cancellation order for lack of jurisdiction and violation of natural justice.
S K Kardam v. Punjab National Bank & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that non-communication of adverse appraisal entries violates natural justice and Article 14, quashing the biased promotion process and directing retrospective promotion of the petitioner.
Krishan Lal Kumar v. Medical Council of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld medical council decisions dismissing medical negligence allegations against a neurosurgeon who operated without a repeat MRI, emphasizing peer review and clinical judgment in such cases.
M/S Lakshmi Energy & Food Ltd v. Reserve Bank of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that RBI-mandated restructuring packages including TEV reports are binding on banks, mandating release of sanctioned working capital, and insolvency proceedings cannot override statutory restructuring obligations.
Ashok Kumar & Sons (HUF) v. Brahma City Private Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that absence of notice under Rule 26 mandates transfer of winding up petitions to the NCLT, and thus it lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate the present petition.
Satish Kumar Jain v. Visual Moondhra & Ors
The Delhi High Court granted the petitioners limited time to vacate premises with reduced occupation charges and conditions for payment, dismissing their request for a longer extension.
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. v. BRAHAM SINGH
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing grant of ACP benefits to an employee despite adverse ACR entries, as those entries were not communicated to him.
Commissioner of Income Tax v. Sony Mobile Communications
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's rejection of transfer pricing adjustments on AMP expenses, disapproving the Bright Line Test and affirming that bundled comparables preclude separate AMP expense adjustments when the assessee is suitably compensated.
Tarun Sawhney v. Uma Lal and Others
The Delhi High Court held that time was not the essence of the Agreements to Sell for immovable property, refused to enforce automatic termination clauses, and granted specific performance to the plaintiff.
M/S POPULAR STEEL v. Raj Kumar; M/S POPULAR STEEL v. Jahangir Alam
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court’s award holding the termination of a workman without valid fixed-term appointment illegal and dismissed the management’s writ petitions challenging compensation granted in lieu of reinstatement.