Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Laxman Narayan Zagade and Ors. v. Competent Authority and District Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Pune and Ors.
The Bombay High Court upheld the Competent Authority's grant of unilateral deemed conveyance under Section 11 of MOFA to a cooperative housing society despite unauthorized construction and absence of occupation certificate, emphasizing the promoter's default cannot bar the society's statutory rights.
Laxman Narayan Zagade and Ors. v. Competent Authority and District Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Pune and Ors.
The Bombay High Court upheld the Competent Authority's power under Section 11 of MOFA to grant unilateral deemed conveyance to a cooperative housing society despite absence of occupation certificate and unauthorized construction, rejecting landowners' challenge.
ACME Enterprises & Anr. v. Deputy Registrar Co-operative Societies (2) & Ors.
The court held that unilateral deemed conveyance under MOFA vests title by summary order but does not conclusively decide title disputes, which must be adjudicated in civil suits to determine land entitlement and construction rights between Developer and Federation.
Shivani Vig Kapoor and Rushi Tiwari Makker v. Registrar of Trademarks
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and set aside the rejection of the trademark "WONDERFUL WORLD", holding it to be suggestive and registrable, and emphasized the need for reasoned refusal orders.
Ganesh Arjun Chukkal v. Melronia Hospitality Private Limited
The Court upheld eviction of licensee Brice and dismissed claims of personal leasehold rights by its director based on a dubious unregistered lease deed, affirming that possession secured by license must be surrendered upon expiry.
R K Associates and Hoteliers Pvt Ltd v. BW Businessworld Media Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court directed reference of disputes to arbitration and appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, rejecting the respondent's contention regarding a subsequent agreement.
GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd & Ors v. MV Golden Pride & Ors
The Bombay High Court upheld the arrest and auction sale of MV Golden Pride for unpaid port dues, confirming the sale to the highest bidder for scrap value under the Admiralty Act, 2017, and dismissed the vessel owners' challenges.
Rafique Rahemtullah Kabani v. The Assistant Engineer & Designated Officer
The Bombay High Court upheld the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation's demolition notice against unauthorized constructions from the 2nd to 8th floors, rejecting natural justice and regularisation claims and dismissing the writ petition with costs.
Yashoda Hospital and Research Center Limited v. Yashoda Super Specialty Hospital and Anr
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex parte IPAB order removing a trademark for failure to effect due service and violation of natural justice, ordering a fresh hearing.
PVR INOX LTD. v. SHEETAL ANSAL & ANR.
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve disputes between the petitioner and Respondent 1, leaving inclusion of Respondent 2 to the arbitrator's discretion.
Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corp Ltd v. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission
The Delhi High Court upheld its earlier orders directing TANGEDCO to pay escalation charges as per CERC's June 2018 Notification effective from April 2017, rejecting objections to retrospective payments and enforcing compliance with its directions.
Amol Kashinath Vyavhare v. Purnima Chaugule Shrirangi
The Bombay High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 505(2), 500, 501, and 502 IPC, holding that reporting internal police disputes does not attract Section 505(2) IPC and that defamation proceedings against public servants require prior sanction under Section 199 CrPC.
Mohd. Shahrukh v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside the conviction under Section 392 IPC due to contradictory prosecution evidence and unreliable identification of stolen property, granting the appellant the benefit of doubt.
Colgate-Palmolive (India) Ltd. v. Anchor Health and Beauty Care Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal complaint alleging forgery of design registration documents due to lack of prima facie evidence and bar of limitation, emphasizing careful judicial scrutiny before summoning accused.
Cadbury U K Limited v. Manoj Agarwal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court decreed a trademark and copyright infringement suit by consent based on a settlement agreement containing undertakings to cease infringing use and withdraw conflicting registrations, and ordered refund of court fees to the plaintiff.
M/S MEX SWITCHGEARS PVT. LTD. v. VIKRAM SURI TRADING AS M/S ARMEX AUTO INDUSTRIES
The Delhi High Court held that service of a counter statement by email without an email ID provided by the opponent does not constitute valid service under Section 143 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, and set aside the order deeming the opposition abandoned.
Nutan Warehousing Company Pvt. Ltd v. The Commissioner, Central Tax, Pune-II
The Bombay High Court held that warehousing services for tea that retains its essential agricultural characteristics after minimal processing are exempt from GST under Notification No. 12/2017, quashing the adverse Advance Ruling orders.
Electonica India Ltd. v. Electonica Hitech Machines Private Limited
The Bombay High Court set aside the Trade Marks Registry's non-speaking orders allowing trademark transmission without considering objections, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication under Section 45 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
Prashant Rambhau Pathare; Dilip Rambhau Pathare; Sandip Rambhau Pathare v. Aparna Ashok Joshi; Amit Ashok Joshi; Anushri Kaustubh Joshi; Vasantraj Champalal Talsera; Goutam Champalal Talsera; Vimalraj Champalal Talsera
The Bombay High Court dismissed the appeal against refusal of temporary injunction in a suit for specific performance due to lack of prima facie proof linking payment to the agreement and inconsistent pleadings by the plaintiffs.
Venus Vasant Valley Co-operative Housing Society Limited v. Sheth Developers Private Limited
The Bombay High Court allowed the developer to continue construction using disclosed FSI and TDR without flat purchasers' consent under Section 7A of MOFA, holding that full disclosure of development potential satisfies statutory requirements and phased development conditions conveyance rights.