Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Saregama India Limited v. Balaji Motion Pictures Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction restraining defendants from using the plaintiff's copyrighted song in their film, applying estoppel due to prior royalty payments and acknowledging infringement.
Noor Mohd. v. East Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking mandamus for possession of disputed plots, holding that title disputes must be resolved by civil courts and are not amenable to writ jurisdiction.
State v. Vicky
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a heroin possession case due to non-compliance with mandatory procedural safeguards under Section 50 of the NDPS Act and inconsistencies in the prosecution's evidence.
United India Insurance Co Ltd v. Khem Karan & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the MACT’s compensation award, holding that rash and negligent driving was established on the preponderance of probabilities despite discrepancies in vehicle identification.
United India Insurance Co Ltd v. Khem Karan & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the MACT's compensation award, confirming liability of the driver for rash and negligent driving causing a fatal accident, despite initial confusion over the vehicle's identity.
United India Insurance Co Ltd v. Khem Karan & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed insurer's appeal and upheld compensation awarded by MACT, holding that the offending vehicle's identity and driver's rash negligence were established on preponderance of probabilities.
United India Insurance Co Ltd v. Rajesh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal challenging the compensation award, holding that the identity of the offending vehicle was established after fresh investigation despite initial registration number discrepancies.
Sh. Mohit Garg & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties in a matrimonial dispute.
Sh. Mohit Garg v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 341, 354A, 506, and 509 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's refusal to prosecute.
Ratan Food Products v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging IRCTC's catering tender conditions excluding consortium participation and upheld the tender's validity under the Railways' Catering Policy.
Anil Kumar Gupta v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the rejection of the highest bidder in a catering tender for non-compliance with mandatory conditions, affirming limited judicial interference in tender decisions.
Lt. Col Amit Sharma v. Central Bureau of Investigation
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging an FIR registered outside its jurisdiction, applying the doctrine of forum conveniens and declining to exercise jurisdiction despite a part of cause of action arising within its territory.
Ajay Kumar Sharma v. Commissioner, South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld compulsory retirement orders under FR 56(j) and Rule 48 of CCS Pension Rules against two municipal officers, affirming limited judicial interference in administrative decisions based on doubtful integrity and public interest.
Ajit Singh Yadav v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging land acquisition proceedings as barred by delay and laches, holding that Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act does not revive stale claims where compensation was paid and possession taken.
Jai Prakash & Ors. v. DG. of Works, CPWD
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order denying regularisation of Beldars as Enquiry Clerks absent sanctioned posts and recruitment rules, directing consideration of creation of posts with age relaxation for recruitment.
Om Prakash & Anr v. Bhim Singh Saini
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a revision petition against eviction, stayed execution of the eviction order till a stipulated date subject to tenant's undertaking to vacate, pay charges, and clear dues.
Narender Kumar Jain v. P D Sharma
The Delhi High Court allowed the tenant's appeal granting leave to defend an eviction petition where the landlord's claimed bonafide need for the premises as a garage was disputed due to non-disclosure of alternative premises.
Harjinder Singh & Anr v. Hari Shankar
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of the eviction revision petition on the tenant's undertaking to vacate by a fixed date, pay use and occupation charges, and stay execution of the eviction order accordingly.
Vinod Poddar v. Hari Shankar
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a revision petition against eviction and stayed execution of the eviction order subject to the tenant’s undertaking to vacate by a specified date and pay use and occupation charges.
Nasir Ali & Ors. v. Mohd Yasin
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition against dismissal of Leave to Defend in an eviction case but granted petitioners one year to vacate premises subject to payment of use and occupation charges and other undertakings.