Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Shanti Devi & Anr v. Saroj Gupta
The High Court dismissed the revision petition against eviction on the ground of bonafide necessity, allowing withdrawal on terms including payment of use and occupation charges and vacating the premises by a stipulated date.
Sanjay Wadhwa & Anr v. Suraj Prakash Pahwa
The Delhi High Court held that a landlord must prima facie substantiate bona fide necessity for eviction with financial documents, and failure to do so entitles the tenant to leave to defend the eviction petition.
Arvind Aggarwal v. Jagwat Prasad
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of a tenant on the ground of bona fide necessity under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, finding no alternative accommodation was available to the landlord.
Asha Ram Singhdia v. Dalip Kumar & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's revision petition against eviction on bonafide necessity grounds but granted one year’s time to vacate the premises subject to conditions and stayed execution of the eviction order.
Darshan Lal v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 135 of The Electricity Act, 2003 following settlement between parties and no objection from the complainant, exercising its discretion under Section 482 CrPC.
Ajay Marwah v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging conviction under Section 138 NI Act, holding that defence during framing of notice is not evidence and the complainant had established a prima facie case.
Dilip Kumar v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition of an Air Force Sergeant seeking NOC and discharge for a Group-B civil post, holding that failure to comply with Air Force Order-4 of 2012 and false declaration justified denial.
GD Prahalad v. Union of India and Ors.
Delhi High Court directed uniform grant of ACP and MACP benefits with arrears and pension revision to former BSF personnel from due dates as per Supreme Court precedent, rejecting respondents' attempt to limit applicability.
CYPRESS FINCAP PRIVATE LIMITED v. VYOGISWAMI FINANCIAL CONSULTANTS LIMITED
Summary judgment under Order XXXVII CPC for recovery of money based on dishonored cheques is maintainable only against the company and not its directors unless the corporate veil is pierced by specific pleadings.
M/S PARKLAND PROPERTIES LTD v. NEW RAJPUT COOPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY
The Delhi High Court dismissed the defendant's application to recall orders granting conditional leave to defend in a summary suit, holding that no special circumstances existed under Order XXXVII Rule 4 CPC to set aside the decree.
M/S ANSAL PROPERTIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. v. MS. NEELAM BHUTANI
The Delhi High Court upheld a court-mediated settlement modifying a labour court award, directing payment of agreed dues and statutory gratuity, and barring further claims.
M/S GOLDEN TOBACCO LIMITED v. ITC LIMITED
The Delhi High Court upheld the IPAB's rejection of belated additional evidence in trademark rectification proceedings but allowed production of original documents at final hearing subject to costs and no adjournment.
Initiating Officer, ACIT Benami Prohibition v. Appellate Tribunal Under The Prohibition Of Benami Property Transactions Act
The Delhi High Court held that the Appellate Tribunal lacks jurisdiction to entertain appeals against show-cause notices under Section 26(1) of the Benami Act and suspended the Tribunal's interim stay on such notice, directing the Adjudicating Authority to proceed with adjudication within statutory timelines.
Union of India v. Neeraj Sharma
The Delhi High Court held that the UPSC's advice in disciplinary matters is advisory and not binding, affirming the Tribunal's modification of compulsory retirement penalty to a lesser punishment.
TATA PROJECTS LTD. & ANR. v. DEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR
The Delhi High Court allowed extension of time for completion of arbitral proceedings under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, with parties' consent, for inter-related disputes arising from the same contract.
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd v. Manoj Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court reduced the interest rate on compensation from 12% to 9% per annum and enhanced the claimant's compensation for 82% permanent disability, including loss of future prospects and attendant charges.
Ajay Sehgal & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC in a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement and divorce between the parties.
M/S Contenra Technologies (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Nikhil Pal
The Delhi High Court upheld the gratuity payment order, ruling that delayed claim petitions before the Controlling Authority are not barred by Rule 7(1) and that uncontroverted continuous service entitles an employee to gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act.
Sanjay v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court set aside the disqualification of the highest bidder based on a single financial transaction with a blacklisted contractor, holding that credible evidence of collusion is necessary for tender disqualification under Clause 1(d).
Dinesh Kumar v. M/S Tread Stone Ltd. and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's finding that the petitioner voluntarily abandoned service and dismissed his writ petition seeking reinstatement after alleged illegal termination.