Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
National Insurance Co Ltd v. Naresh Kumar
The Delhi High Court partially allowed the insurer's appeal by apportioning 10% contributory negligence to the deceased and enhanced compensation for loss of love and affection and consortium to the claimants in a fatal motor accident claim.
Kamal Rohilla & Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed cross FIRs arising from a family dispute upon amicable settlement and non-opposition by complainants, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to maintain family harmony.
Deepak Jain v. BCHELECTRIC LTD. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the criminal petitions as withdrawn after the respondents withdrew their complaints against the petitioner.
Azpiaruddin v. The State (N.C.T of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioners to withdraw their bail applications and dismissed the petitions as withdrawn.
Dharamveer Yadav @ Dharambir Yadav v. Nirmal Gupta @ Nirmala Gupta
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction on bonafide necessity grounds where the landlord, elderly and handicapped, required the premises for residence, rejecting unsubstantiated tenant claims of alternative ownership.
Iqbal Ahmed & Ors. v. Nigar Mustafa
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition against eviction after the tenants undertook to vacate the premises by a specified date and pay use and occupation charges, staying execution of the eviction order accordingly.
Jamal Mohd. Khan & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and related proceedings based on a bona fide settlement and the complainant's consent.
Ram Lakhan Sharma v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to quash conviction under Section 138 NI Act based on settlement and partial payment, acquitting the petitioner and waiving costs considering his poor financial condition.
Dinesh Kumar @ Dinesh Kumar Gautam v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR and proceedings arising from a matrimonial dispute upon amicable settlement and the complainant's refusal to prosecute.
Naveen Kotiya v. State
The Delhi High Court held that bail applications in cases triable by the Sessions Court cannot be entertained by the Metropolitan Magistrate before committal and granted interim protection from arrest until committal.
Ajay Jerath & Anr. v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail for accused under Sections 380 and 448 IPC due to ongoing investigation and pending recovery of stolen articles.
Sh. N.K. Madhok v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging denial of interest on delayed pension arrears and pension for service period at NAA, holding that formal application is required for pension benefits and no pension scheme existed for the disputed period.
Sh. Naveen Kumar v. M/S Sir Ganga Ram City Hospital and Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte Labour Court award and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication after both parties sought relief, emphasizing the need for a fair hearing.
Bhumika Choudhary v. All India Institute of Medical Sciences
The Delhi High Court held that an OBC certificate dated one day prior to seat allocation is valid for admission under the OBC quota despite being issued after the first counseling round, directing AIIMS to allot the petitioner a seat accordingly.
Raju Kumar Gaur alias Rajiv Prasad v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 304 Part II IPC based on reliable dying declaration, corroborative CCTV footage, and medical evidence, dismissing the appellant's challenge to electronic evidence and delay in FIR.
AAP INFRASTRUCTURES LTD. v. BANK OF BARODA AND ANR.
The Delhi High Court granted a temporary stay on the Bank of Baroda's declaration of AAP Infrastructures Ltd. as a wilful defaulter, emphasizing the need to provide reasons and an opportunity to challenge before adverse publication.
Krishan Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court remanded termination cases back to the Tribunal for fresh hearing, holding that each recruitment irregularity report must be independently examined with fair opportunity to the affected employees.
MAPLE LOGISTICS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR v. PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ORS
The Delhi High Court held that refund under Section 143(1) cannot be withheld merely due to issuance of a Section 143(2) notice unless the Assessing Officer records valid reasons under Section 241A with prior approval, and directed reconsideration or release of the refund.
Quippo Construction Equipment Ltd v. Janardan Nirman Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against refusal of interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act due to invalid unilateral arbitrator appointment and unresolved territorial jurisdiction.
Ashok Solanki v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties, holding that no useful purpose would be served by further prosecution.