Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Deepak Nanda @ Vicky Nanda v. The State of Delhi
Anticipatory bail was denied to the petitioner accused of cheating and criminal conspiracy due to serious allegations, non-cooperation with investigation, and necessity of custodial interrogation at the initial stage.
Rajinder Narang v. The State of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application of Rajinder Narang in a cheating and criminal conspiracy case involving misrepresentation of property encumbrances.
Rahul Narang v. The State of Delhi
Anticipatory bail was dismissed where the petitioner was found prima facie involved in criminal conspiracy and cheating by misrepresenting encumbrances on property sold to the complainant.
Shefali Narang v. The State of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail to the petitioner accused of criminal conspiracy and cheating by misrepresenting encumbrance-free status of mortgaged property in a sale transaction.
Sunita Devi v. Bharti Axa General Insurance Co Ltd
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to enhance compensation in a motor accident claim by applying the correct multiplier, granting loss of future prospects, and adding 40% to loss of dependency as per Supreme Court precedent.
Sarva Chintan Foundation v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the PIL challenging the 2017 policy on milk stall allotments at railway platforms, holding that the court will not interfere with valid policy decisions made by the executive under Article 226.
M/S GLOBAL TRANSNATIONAL TRADING FZE v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that disputes under the urea supply contract containing an arbitration clause must be resolved through arbitration, not writ proceedings.
Shyam Sunder v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application of Shyam Sunder in a cheating and criminal breach of trust case, emphasizing the seriousness of allegations, non-cooperation with investigation, and the need for custodial interrogation.
SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC INDIA PVT. LTD v. RENTWORKS INDIA PVT. LTD. & ORS
Delhi High Court decreed recovery of amounts paid by plaintiff on behalf of defendant under Closure Agreement, rejecting defendant's jurisdictional and procedural objections.
Mahua Moitra v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a prospective accused has no right to participate in pre-summoning proceedings and set aside the stay of defamation complaint proceedings granted by the Additional Sessions Judge as illegal.
RAM CHARAN & ORS. v. STATE & ANR.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354B, 509, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and the complainant's withdrawal of prosecution.
Rajiv Bajaj v. State and Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 420, 468, 471, and 34 IPC against the petitioner following a settlement and refund to the complainants, holding that further prosecution would serve no useful purpose.
Vikas Vasudeva v. Land & Development Officer
The Delhi High Court quashed the allotment of park land for a fuel station in Zone B-3, holding that such allotment without statutory amendment of the Master Plan and Zonal Development Plan is illegal and void.
DHARAMPAL SATYAPAL SONS PRIVATE LIMITED v. MR. AKSHAY SINGHAL & ORS.
The Delhi High Court declared 'PULSE' a well-known trademark and granted permanent injunction against defendants for infringing and diluting the plaintiff's trademark and trade dress.
Pavit Singh v. Central Bureau of Investigation
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking CBI investigation into alleged forest land encroachments, holding that vague allegations without evidence do not justify such direction and emphasizing due process and completion of demarcation before action.
Justice for Rights Foundation and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the PIL seeking a ban on hazardous vehicle horns and silencers, noting ongoing enforcement actions by authorities and directing continued compliance with the law.
Sh. Sanjay Kumar v. Shri Anil Aggarwal
The Delhi High Court granted leave to defend to a tenant challenging eviction on bonafide necessity grounds, emphasizing the need for credible evidence and triable issues before eviction under the Delhi Rent Control Act.
Anyay Virodhi Morcha v. Food Corporation of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition styled as public interest litigation for seeking FIRs against private vehicle owners, holding it to be a private interest matter not maintainable as a PIL.
Shiningkart Ecommerce Pvt Ltd v. Jiayun Data Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld the Arbitral Tribunal's interim order under Section 17 of the Arbitration Act directing the petitioner to maintain Rs. 30 Crores in its bank accounts to secure the respondent's claims, dismissing the appeal for lack of perversity.
CPIO Delhi Cantonment Board v. Central Information Commission
The Delhi High Court quashed the penalty imposed on a CPIO under the RTI Act for delay in furnishing information, holding that a bona fide explanation constitutes reasonable cause exempting from penalty.