Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Ram Bai & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an insurer covering third-party risk under a contractors plant and machinery policy is liable for compensation in a motor vehicle accident on a public road, modifying the quantum of compensation as per Supreme Court guidelines.
M/S ONE UP TRADE NET WORKS PVT LTD v. COMMISSIONER OF DELHI VALUE ADDED TAX DEPARTMENT OF TRADE & TAXES
The Delhi High Court directed the VAT authority to decide the petitioner's pending refund claim with interest under the Delhi VAT Act within eight weeks after providing an opportunity of hearing.
Anil Goyal & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A/34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties.
Bhojraj @ Sumit v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 406 and 420 IPC on the ground of an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Naresh Nagpal & Ors. v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a writ petition challenging a Deputy Commissioner's order under the Delhi Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Rules, directing the petitioners to pursue their remedy through the statutory appellate authority.
Inderjeet & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 324, and 34 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement between family members, exercising its inherent jurisdiction to prevent abuse of process.
Khajanchi and Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323/341/506/34 IPC on the ground of an amicable settlement between family members, exercising its power under Section 482 CrPC.
Pankaj & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties.
M/S FAQIR CHAND DALIP KUMAR & ORS v. HDFC BANK LIMITED
The Delhi High Court granted limited time to the petitioners to vacate secured property under SARFAESI possession proceedings, emphasizing the secured creditor's right to possession despite delay.
Joginder @ Danny v. State
The Delhi High Court granted a two-week extension of parole on humanitarian grounds for the petitioner to attend his daughter's surgery, subject to conditions ensuring compliance.
Abdul Lateef Nomani v. University of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the University of Delhi cannot deny admission based on non-affiliation of a school board to COBSE and directed admission of a petitioner whose board is established under a Central University Act.
Nandan Singh v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court upheld the denial of Hospital Patient Care Allowance to Electrical Beldars, holding that their duties do not involve continuous and routine contact with infected patients or materials as required for entitlement.
Veena Gupta v. Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Co. Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that the appearance of a prepared junior counsel suffices for court proceedings and set aside costs wrongly imposed for non-appearance when such counsel was present.
Manjeet Singh Chugh v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the order directing inquiry into a co-accused already convicted for a separate offence and directed the trial court to hear the parties afresh on framing of charges.
Kaverdeep Singh Khera v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under the Arms Act for possession of a single cartridge without a firearm, holding that unconscious possession without threat does not warrant prosecution.
Karni Communications Private Limited v. Haicheng Vivo Mobile (India) Private Limited
The Delhi High Court directed the parties' nominated arbitrators to appoint the presiding arbitrator under the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, allowing the petition for constitution of the arbitral tribunal.
Manjit Singh & Anr. v. Virendra Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of tenants for non-payment of rent arrears, emphasizing strict compliance with rent control laws and rejecting condonation of prolonged delay.
Amir Ain v. Qaadira
The Delhi High Court disposed of a possession appeal by recording and enforcing a voluntary settlement between parties under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC, modifying the decree accordingly.
Raman Sharma & Anr. v. Director, Directorate of Enforcement & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a private complaint under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act for lack of FIR registration, maintainability, and jurisdiction.
Su-Kam Power Systems Ltd. v. Kunwer Sachdev & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff, holding that defendant no.1 had no real prospect of defending trademark ownership claims and was estopped from denying plaintiff's rights over the Su-Kam mark.