Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Central Cottage Industries Corporation of India Ltd. v. Radhey Shyam
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex parte Labour Court award due to lack of proper service of notice and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, while directing payment of back wages under Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act.
EXIM INTERNATIONAL v. TRANSTECHNOSOFT PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.
The Delhi High Court condoned delay, proceeded ex-parte against non-appearing respondents, and appointed a sole arbitrator under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate the dispute.
Suristh Tiwary v. Amarpali Homes Projects Ltd.
Delhi High Court allowed arbitration petition, appointed sole arbitrator, and deleted non-relieved party, affirming jurisdiction based on arbitration seat clause.
Salek Ram v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of accused in a dowry death case, holding that the prosecution failed to prove cruelty or harassment 'soon before death' as required under Section 304-B IPC.
State v. Sushil and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal against acquittal, holding that inconsistencies in eyewitness accounts, unexplained delays, and unreliable recovery raised reasonable doubt, justifying the Trial Court's decision.
Ravi Gupta & Anr. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and criminal proceedings arising from a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement and the complainant's decision not to prosecute further.
AMAN MAMTAHNI & ORS. v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and criminal proceedings in a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement and the complainant's decision not to prosecute further.
Indian Human Rights Front v. East Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking demolition of unauthorized roadside constructions after finding that the municipal corporation had already removed the encroachments.
Mahtab and Ors. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Wakf Board to complete statutory proceedings to remove encroachments on a Muslim graveyard, dismissing the PIL as the removal process was underway under the Wakf Act, 1995.
Social Jurist v. Government of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking enforcement of the 7th Pay Commission recommendations for unaided private school employees, holding that individual employees must approach the court themselves and noting the schools' rights under the Delhi School Education Act regarding fee regulation.
Gurinder Singh v. Jasjit Kaur
Eviction petition based solely on the bona fide need of a deceased person does not survive, and non-occupation under Section 19 of the Delhi Rent Control Act entitles the tenant to retain possession.
M/S METRO BUILDERS (ORISSA) PVT LTD v. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award due to delay beyond the statutory limitation period under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that delay beyond 120 days cannot be condoned.
Rajat Chauhan & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and criminal proceedings under multiple IPC sections following an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's consent.
Gurdeep Singh & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and related proceedings under Sections 323, 452, 506, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
SMT. MAMTA & ORS v. STATE & ANR.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and criminal proceedings under IPC sections 323, 341, 356, 379, and 34 following an amicable settlement between the parties under Section 482 CrPC.
Anand Yadav and Pradyumn Rao v. Mera Baba Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court allowed defendants to amend their written statements to plead loss suffered in recovery suits, emphasizing that amendments should not be denied merely due to framing of issues or commencement of evidence.
INTERNETFUND IIIPTE LTD v. AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS (INCOME-TAX) & ANR
The Delhi High Court directed the Authority for Advance Rulings to dispose of the petitioner's pending application within two months, enforcing the statutory six-month disposal period under Section 245R(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Jaiprakash Kataria & Anr v. M/S Indian Overseas Co. Pvt. Ltd
The Delhi High Court granted leave to withdraw the petitions and dismissed them along with pending applications as withdrawn.
M/S SHREE ENTERPRISES v. ZACHARIAN MATHEW ABRAHAM
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw criminal petitions with liberty to raise defenses before the Trial Court and dismissed pending applications.
Federation of Pharma Entrepreneurs v. Employees State Insurance Corporation
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging tender conditions as infructuous after tender awards but granted liberty to challenge similar future tenders.