Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Rolls-Royce PLC v. Deputy Director of Income Tax, Circle-2(1), International Taxation, New Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed Rolls-Royce PLC's appeals, affirming that its Indian subsidiary constituted a Permanent Establishment in India, and upheld the taxability of income attributable to that PE for multiple assessment years.
The State v. Gaurav @ Mohit & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal challenging acquittals under Section 307 IPC, holding that the prosecution failed to prove grievous injury or intent to kill, while upholding conviction under Section 324 IPC.
Ran Vijay Singh v. Central Industrial Security Force
The Delhi High Court upheld the compulsory retirement of a CISF constable found guilty of intoxication and misconduct, affirming limited judicial interference in departmental enquiries conducted fairly and based on evidence.
Rahul Dev Mandal v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for rape of a minor under 13 years, holding that consent of a minor is immaterial and sole credible testimony of the prosecutrix suffices for conviction under Section 376 IPC and POCSO Act.
Umesh Kumar v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal and upheld his conviction under Sections 323 and 354 IPC, holding that minor inconsistencies in witness statements do not vitiate the prosecution case supported by medical evidence.
Shree Vijay Shanti Suri Education Trust & Anr. v. Arun Kumar Purohit & Ors.
The Delhi High Court closed the contempt petition against the Central Government and CCIM for non-disclosure of a rejection order, allowing 44 admitted Ayurveda students to appear for exams while pending writ petitions are adjudicated.
Ravita & Ors. v. Suresh
The High Court held that recalling a witness to clarify evidence is permissible but admitting fresh documents and reopening evidence after trial closure is impermissible without valid reasons.
Kalpana Mehdiratta v. Air Force Bal Bharati School & Ors.
Delhi High Court quashed Vice-Principal promotion due to reasonable apprehension of bias and tampering of ACR, directing re-consideration by a reconstituted DPC excluding the biased member.
Union of India v. Vinod Ashwini Saxena
The Delhi High Court set aside the CAT's order fixing Mr. Saxena's seniority based on his IES service, holding that only his ICAS service year was relevant for seniority in RAS, and emphasized strict adherence to service rules and promotion fitness criteria.
Amit Sahni v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the Government to consider and implement procedural reforms to ensure fairness and impartiality in the functioning of the Sentence Review Board under the CrPC and Delhi Prison Rules.
Animesh v. The Central Board of Secondary Education
The Delhi High Court held that CBSE's valuation instructions are directory, courts will not interfere with subjective evaluation once prescribed revaluation remedies are exhausted, and directed CBSE to update marks as per expert committee findings.
Ateet Bansal v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking directions to make the National Career Service portal comprehensive and to regulate recruitment fees and delays, holding that existing government directives suffice and specific grievances must be litigated individually.
Monu Bhadana v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking demolition of alleged illegal constructions in Mehrauli for lack of necessary parties and cogent evidence, and questioned the petitioner's bonafides.
AMBAY INDUSTRIAL CORPORATIONS v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking refund of Rs. 50 lakhs deposited during a Customs Act investigation and refused to restrain coercive action, holding that such relief is premature without cogent evidence of coercion.
Rohit Bhalla v. Ministry of Railways
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Railway Claims Tribunal recruitment notices, holding that judicial interference in an ongoing selection process is premature without clear evidence of illegality.
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd v. M/S Vindhya Telelinks Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that delay beyond the 120-day limitation period under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot be condoned, dismissing the petition to set aside the arbitral award for unexplained delay.
Raj Woodart Interior Limited v. DMIA Land (India) Pvt. Ltd.
Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator by mutual consent of parties under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and allowed respondent to raise counterclaim.
M/S Vaidya Industries v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the administrative debarment of a seller for supplying a different smartphone model than contracted, upholding the reduced 90-day penalty and refusing to interfere under Article 226.
Chandrakant Uttam Kolekar & Ors. v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that the Mahalunge-Maan Town Planning Scheme was sanctioned and implemented in violation of statutory procedures and constitutional rights, entitling landowners to monetary compensation and mandating adherence to mandatory consultation and compensation determination processes.
Col Anil Kumar Gupta v. Union of India & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that the trial by General Court Martial was barred by the three-year limitation under Section 122 of the Army Act and quashed the trial order, while allowing disciplinary proceedings to continue.