Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Gannon Dunkerley & Co Ltd. v. Elena Power and Infrastructure Limited
Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 where parties failed to agree on the arbitrator's name.
M/S BARISTA COFFEE COMPANY LIMITED & ANR. v. M/S DHARAMPAL PREMCHAND LTD
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a valid arbitration agreement between the parties.
Nitu @ Ritu & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi
Anticipatory bail was denied to accused involved in dowry death and murder due to serious allegations, early investigation stage, and necessity of custodial interrogation.
Vinod Kumar v. Kamlesh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner’s delayed leave to defend application but stayed eviction execution on the petitioner’s undertaking to vacate the premises and pay use and occupation charges.
D.K. Chopra v. NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking deferral of Vidhan Sabha elections and CBI inquiry, emphasizing judicial restraint in election matters and availability of statutory remedies for police grievances.
BHARTIYA RAIL BIJLEE COMPANY LTD. v. VOLTAS LIMITED
The Delhi High Court allowed a joint petition extending the time for completion of arbitral proceedings and passing of the award by one year under Sections 29A(3) and 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
NEHA AVIATION MANAGEMENT PVT. LTD v. AIR INDIA SATS AIRPORT SERVICES PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court held that a party official with interest in the dispute cannot unilaterally appoint a sole arbitrator, terminated the arbitrator's mandate, and appointed an independent arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Sameer Jain & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that delegation of recommendatory powers to ASCI for handling misleading advertisements does not constitute excessive delegation of governmental authority and dismissed the petition challenging it.
Gannon Dunkerley & Co Ltd. v. Sinnar Thermal Power Limited
Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 where parties failed to agree on the arbitrator's name.
Ravipal Singh & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 506, and 34 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement and peaceful living between husband and wife.
Bhupendra Singh Patel v. Multi Agency Group & Anr
The Delhi High Court directed the investigating agency to complete the ongoing investigation into allegations involving shell companies in the Bahamas as early as possible, disposing of the PIL with no further court monitoring.
State v. Raju
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a POCSO case due to inconsistencies in the victim's testimony and lack of corroborative evidence, emphasizing the need for proof beyond reasonable doubt.
Mohd. Yakub @ Salman v. The State of Delhi
Anticipatory bail was denied to the petitioner involved in a violent attack on police officials, as custodial interrogation was necessary and the allegations were serious.
Pravasi Legal Cell v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging Rule 43 of the Aircraft (Public Health) Rules, 1954, holding that the 48-hour advance intimation requirement for importation of dead bodies can be waived upon submission of requisite documents.
State v. Sameer Ali & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld acquittal in a dowry death case, holding that prosecution failed to prove cruelty soon before death as required under Section 304-B IPC.
State v. Akash
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of an accused under Section 307 IPC due to contradictions in prosecution evidence and reiterated the cautious approach appellate courts must adopt in interfering with acquittals.
Oil and Natural Gas Corporation v. Krishan Gopal
The Supreme Court referred for reconsideration the legal principles on regularisation of temporary workmen under ONGC's Certified Standing Orders and unfair labour practices, emphasizing the applicability of Umadevi and statutory limits on regularisation.
Oil and Natural Gas Corporation v. Krishan Gopal
The Supreme Court held that the PCLU decision on automatic regularisation of temporary ONGC workmen after 240 days' service requires reconsideration in light of constitutional principles and prior precedents, and referred the batch of appeals to a larger Bench.
Nitesh Kumar Pandey v. The State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors.
The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's ruling invalidating the introduction of a computer efficiency test mid-way in the Gram Rojgar Sahayak recruitment process, holding such alteration unauthorized and candidates not estopped from challenging it.
Nitesh Kumar Pandey v. The State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors.
The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision invalidating the introduction of a computer efficiency test mid-way in the recruitment process for Gram Rojgar Sahayak, holding that such alteration of selection criteria without authority is impermissible.