Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Ved Prakash Aggarwal v. Nitu Tiwari & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the eviction revision petition on undertaking to vacate the premises by a specified date, stayed eviction execution conditionally, and permitted limited repair works without structural changes.
Pawan & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and criminal proceedings in a matrimonial dispute upon the parties' amicable settlement and the complainant's withdrawal of prosecution.
Sunita Sharma v. Vikas Mohan Sharma
The High Court dismissed the petitions as withdrawn on the petitioners' request, granting them liberty to pursue other legal remedies.
Sanjeev Kumar v. State
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail in a family dispute case where parties had mutually settled, subject to cooperation with investigation and furnishing personal bonds.
Ravinder Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court set aside the tribunal's refusal to grant pay fixation benefits under the 6th Central Pay Commission and directed respondents to consider petitioners' representations with a speaking order.
Madanjit Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition challenging its earlier order on administrative irregularities, reaffirming the limited scope of review jurisdiction under Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC.
M. D. Overseas Limited v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that DGFT cannot amend the Foreign Trade Policy by Public Notice excluding certain export items from Advance Authorization, quashing the impugned Public Notice and directing reconsideration of the petitioner's applications.
Praveen Kumar Chaudhary & Ors. v. Election Commission of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 62(5) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, holding that the statutory disqualification of prisoners from voting is a reasonable classification and does not violate the Constitution.
Pankaj Chadha v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of an accused charged with robbery and illegal arms possession, emphasizing the seriousness of the offences and the petitioner’s identification and involvement in multiple FIRs.
D.T.C. v. Hukum Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's order substituting the removal of a bus driver with stoppage of increments and reinstatement, holding that the punishment was disproportionate given the exigent circumstances and absence of fraudulent intent.
Ashwani @ Kali v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
Bail was denied to the petitioner accused of heroin possession under the NDPS Act due to the serious nature of the offence and his prior criminal record.
Shri Vineet Sahai v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL challenging an FSSAI order on pesticide limits in imported pulses as the order was superseded by a subsequent notification addressing the concerns.
Urmila & Ors. v. IFFCO Tokio Ins Co Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced the compensation awarded in a motor accident claim by applying minimum wages, future prospects, and increasing non-pecuniary damages while reducing funeral expenses.
S K Cosmetics v. The Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks
The Delhi High Court held that Forms TM-33 and TM-34 cannot change trademark ownership; ownership changes require Form TM-P with due process including notice and hearing.
Nisar Ahmad v. Rajendra Kumar Soni & Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by adding 25% future prospects to loss of earning capacity and increasing amounts for pain and suffering, loss of amenities, and disfigurement.
RAYS POWER EXPERT PVT. LTD. v. INDRAPRASTHA POWER GENERATION CO. LTD.
The Delhi High Court held that a three-year debarment for non-submission of performance security was disproportionate and directed reconsideration of the debarment period considering the petitioner's explanations.
Sunita Verma v. Permanand Verma
The Delhi High Court set aside the Family Court's closure of the petitioner's evidence and denial of cross-examination, emphasizing the constitutional right to a fair trial and the judicious exercise of Section 311 Cr.P.C. powers.
Guddo Devi @ Guddi v. Bhupender Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld conviction under Section 138 NI Act, ruling that loans from unregistered money lenders and cash payment violations under Income Tax Act do not render the debt unenforceable when liability is admitted.
Rumal Singh v. D.T.C. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court enhanced the back wages from 25% to 50% for a reinstated workman removed on unproven allegations, emphasizing fair compensation despite lack of proof of alternative employment.
Mukesh Sharma v. The State (GNCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail to the petitioner implicated in a Rs. 2 crore cheating case, holding that investigation revealed his complicity and custodial interrogation was necessary.