Full Text
Translation output
Itp HIGH COURT OF DELHI BAIL APPLN.109412019 RITESH MAGGO
Petition . er
Through Goswami,Advs. STATE& ANR.
Petition . er
Through Goswami,Advs. STATE& ANR.
VERSUS
Through ....Respondents Mr.AmitChadha,APPforStatewith
SIRajendraDhaka,PSRajoun UxfumtGaba,Adv.forcomplainant
'^BAIL APPLN.1096/2019 SANJEEV KUMAR
Through STATE& ANR.
SIRajendraDhaka,PSRajoun UxfumtGaba,Adv.forcomplainant
'^BAIL APPLN.1096/2019 SANJEEV KUMAR
Through STATE& ANR.
VERSUS
Through Petitioner Mr.MohitMathur,Sr.Adv.with
Mr.SahilMunjalandMr.Prateek Goswami,Advs. .... Respondents
Mr.AmitChadha,APPforStatewith SIRajendraDhaka,PSRajoun
M^WGaha,Adv.forcomplainant ^SeMR.JUSTICESURESH KUMAR KAIT order
0/ 11.02.2020 pLuanttothed.rectionspassedhythisCourt,Investrgatin,Officer h filed an explanation stating therein thatno settlemen
(10)ofthe case has filed an expiana ...nm 2020:DHC:3853
// Mr. Mathur, learned Senior Counsel appearing ^
— - ~d~^
—. ,,.,.d .onr nrodile
ToTsiOMirandsanrewaslodgedvideDDNo..3PPregardingpuarrel
Panscrrpdonandau.orecordsnra,deas.edPr^c—i.
„ndoned PC.call w.^ crunn During course of inquiry, necessary aetion. During mutual consent related to family dispute.Both parties ^ Krishan andrefusedforanypoliceaction.Hence,PCR riTf merits ofthe ease and keeping in
However,without commoning .onaidered view factsandcircumstancesofpresentcase, viewthatpresentcaseISfitforanticipa concerned, is hereby
Accordingly, the SHO/ Arresting Officer/lU directedthatintheeventofarrest,petitionem/applicantsbereleasedonba onthefollowmgtermsandc™^ personal bonds in the sum of ri^i The petitioners shall tumisn p . r-
„0».
-o.m ~"U (ii)The petitioners shall eoop dremselves available for interrogation by police officer, as
" t - .1«- Before parfrng with the order,it is relevatrt to containedt„thtsordershaUbeconstrued asanexpress.onon the prosecution case.
Applicationsstanddisposed of.
Dasti. V fey SURESH KUMAR KAIT,J FEBRUARY 11,2020/rk
Mr.SahilMunjalandMr.Prateek Goswami,Advs. .... Respondents
Mr.AmitChadha,APPforStatewith SIRajendraDhaka,PSRajoun
M^WGaha,Adv.forcomplainant ^SeMR.JUSTICESURESH KUMAR KAIT order
0/ 11.02.2020 pLuanttothed.rectionspassedhythisCourt,Investrgatin,Officer h filed an explanation stating therein thatno settlemen
(10)ofthe case has filed an expiana ...nm 2020:DHC:3853
// Mr. Mathur, learned Senior Counsel appearing ^
— - ~d~^
—. ,,.,.d .onr nrodile
ToTsiOMirandsanrewaslodgedvideDDNo..3PPregardingpuarrel
Panscrrpdonandau.orecordsnra,deas.edPr^c—i.
„ndoned PC.call w.^ crunn During course of inquiry, necessary aetion. During mutual consent related to family dispute.Both parties ^ Krishan andrefusedforanypoliceaction.Hence,PCR riTf merits ofthe ease and keeping in
However,without commoning .onaidered view factsandcircumstancesofpresentcase, viewthatpresentcaseISfitforanticipa concerned, is hereby
Accordingly, the SHO/ Arresting Officer/lU directedthatintheeventofarrest,petitionem/applicantsbereleasedonba onthefollowmgtermsandc™^ personal bonds in the sum of ri^i The petitioners shall tumisn p . r-
„0».
-o.m ~"U (ii)The petitioners shall eoop dremselves available for interrogation by police officer, as
" t - .1«- Before parfrng with the order,it is relevatrt to containedt„thtsordershaUbeconstrued asanexpress.onon the prosecution case.
Applicationsstanddisposed of.
Dasti. V fey SURESH KUMAR KAIT,J FEBRUARY 11,2020/rk
JUDGMENT