Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Samta Naidu & Anr. v. State of Madhya Pradesh and Anr.
The Supreme Court held that a second criminal complaint on the same facts dismissed on merits under Section 203 CrPC is not maintainable unless exceptional circumstances exist, and dismissed the second complaint as an abuse of process.
Shah Faesal v. Union of India
The Supreme Court held there is no conflict between Prem Nath Kaul and Sampat Prakash judgments on Article 370 and refused to refer the matter to a larger Bench.
Than Kunwar v. State of Haryana
The Supreme Court upheld conviction under the NDPS Act, ruling that non-production of entire contraband and minor discrepancies in witness testimony do not vitiate prosecution if seizure and sample testing are proved and Section 50 applies only to personal searches.
Than Kunwar v. State of Haryana
The Supreme Court upheld conviction under the NDPS Act, ruling that non-production of contraband and minor procedural discrepancies do not vitiate conviction if seizure and forensic evidence are established.
The Superintendent of Post Office, Bolangir Division, Bolangir, Odisha v. Jambu Kumar Jain; The Superintendent of Post Office, Bolangir Division, Bolangir, Odisha v. Chhagan Lal Jain
The Supreme Court held that lost Indira Vikas Patras purchased by cash cannot be claimed or replaced without physical certificates, and refusal to pay maturity value under such circumstances does not constitute deficiency in service.
Pawan Kumar Arya v. Ravi Kumar Arya
The Supreme Court held that a family settlement embodied in a consent decree cannot be partially executed without full compliance by both parties, directing the RA Group to countersign the allotment letter subject to the execution of supplemental consent terms.
Pawan Kumar Arya v. Ravi Kumar Arya
The Supreme Court held that partial execution of a comprehensive family settlement consent decree is impermissible without full compliance, directing the parties to execute supplemental terms and the RA Group to counter-sign the letter of allotment with restrictions on alienation.
State Bank of India v. Rameshyam Pandey
The Supreme Court held that SBI employees who opted for the 2000 Voluntary Retirement Scheme after completing 15 years of service are entitled to pension benefits as per the scheme approved by the Government and IBA, overruling SBI's pension regulations requiring 20 years of service.
Assistant General Manager, State Bank of India & Ors. v. Radhey Shyam Pandey
The Supreme Court held that employees retiring under SBI’s 2000 Voluntary Retirement Scheme on completion of 15 years of service are entitled to pension benefits as per the scheme, and the bank cannot deny pension by relying on existing pension rules requiring 20 years of service.
State Bank of India v. Rameshyam Pandey
The Supreme Court held that SBI employees completing 15 years of service under the 2000 VRS are entitled to pension benefits as per the approved scheme, overruling SBI's denial based on pension regulations requiring 20 years.
Assistant General Manager, State Bank of India & Ors. v. Radhey Shyam Pandey
The Supreme Court held that employees retiring under SBI's 2000 Voluntary Retirement Scheme after 15 years of service are entitled to pension benefits as per the scheme, rejecting SBI's attempt to deny pension based on existing pension rules requiring 20 years of service.
Jose v. Johnson
The Supreme Court held that in a suit for permanent injunction where ownership and property identity are disputed, proper evidence and opportunity must be afforded, and remanded the matter for fresh trial, setting aside the High Court's restoration of the trial court decree.
Satishkumar Nyalchand Shah v. State of Gujarat & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that a co-accused already charge-sheeted and on trial has no locus to be impleaded in proceedings seeking further investigation against another accused not charge-sheeted under Section 173(8) CrPC.
Satishkumar Nyalchand Shah v. Gujarat State and Others
An accused already charge-sheeted and undergoing trial has no locus standi to be impleaded in a further investigation application under Section 173(8) CrPC against another accused not yet charge-sheeted.
Satishkumar Nyalchand Shah v. State of Gujarat & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that a co-accused already charge-sheeted and undergoing trial has no locus standi to be impleaded in an application under Section 173(8) CrPC seeking further investigation against another accused not charge-sheeted.
State of Odisha v. M/s. Jindal Steel and Power Ltd.
The Supreme Court held that transportation of legally procured and royalty-paid iron ore stock within a mining lease area does not constitute prohibited mining operations, allowing JSPL to transport the ore subject to compliance with conditions.
State of Odisha v. Jindal Steel and Power Ltd.
The Supreme Court held that transportation of legally procured and royalty paid iron ore by a purchaser from within a mining lease area is not a mining operation and allowed JSPL to transport the ore subject to compliance by the mining leaseholder.
AGSON GLOBAL PVT. LTD. v. INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK
The Delhi High Court set aside a bank's rejection of a COVID-19 relief loan application for failing to consider updated government scheme modifications removing the Rs.500 crore loan limit.
Delhi Waqf Board v. Principal Secretary, Revenue and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a Review Petition challenging its earlier order, holding that alleged violation of court directions must be addressed by contempt or separate writ petitions, not by review.
Ashok Kumar Jain and Anr. v. National Law University Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL challenging the appointment of a university professor and registrar, holding that the incumbent possessed requisite qualifications and that procedural objections must be pursued through appropriate legal forums.