Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Joint Labour Commissioner and Registering Officer and Anr v. Kesar Lal
The Supreme Court held that construction workers registered under the Building and Other Construction Workers Act, 1996 are consumers under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and can seek redress for deficiency of service from welfare boards.
Joint Labour Commissioner and Registering Officer and Anr v. Kesar Lal
The Supreme Court held that construction workers registered under the Building and Other Construction Workers Act, 1996 who contribute to welfare schemes are 'consumers' under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and can seek redress for deficiency of service before consumer forums.
54e749c0b08f9b3a9cae9cbcffb00239809a896cfb7bc35a7e3b56257de4907c
The court upheld the conviction of the accused, affirming that the prosecution proved guilt beyond reasonable doubt and procedural safeguards were duly observed.
Jagshi Jethabhai Chheda & Anr. v. District Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Mumbai & Ors.
The Bombay High Court set aside the registration of a deemed conveyance for failure to comply with the mandatory summons and hearing requirements under Section 11(5) of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963.
Corporal Abhdesh Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Union of India to grant pro rata pension with arrears and interest to a discharged corporal upon verification of service details, consistent with prior rulings.
Angad Sahlot v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking directions to add sections and transfer investigation, holding that the alternate remedy under Section 156(3) CrPC is available and ongoing investigation negates the need for court interference.
NCS PEARSON, INC. v. SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
The High Court of Delhi dismissed the writ petition filed by NCS Pearson, Inc. as withdrawn upon the petitioner's request.
Gurpreet Singh Mangat v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 25 Arms Act against a petitioner due to lack of conscious possession and mens rea, holding that mere recovery of a cartridge without knowledge does not constitute an offence.
Prem Singh v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging framing of charges under Section 308 IPC, holding that alteration of charges at an advanced trial stage is not warranted and the trial court may convict under appropriate sections based on evidence.
M/S. PAUL SALES PVT. LTD. v. M/S. HARI DARSHAN SEVASHRAM PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court held that an oral, determinable contract granting exclusive distributorship rights is not specifically enforceable under Section 14 of the Specific Relief Act, and injunctions to enforce such exclusivity cannot be granted, resulting in dismissal of the plaintiff's suit.
PEPS INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED v. KURLON LIMITED
The Delhi High Court held that the defendant failed to prove continuous prior use of the trademark "NO TURN" and that its use was descriptive, thereby upholding the plaintiff's registered trademark rights and continuing the injunction against the defendant.
ANUJ KUMAR NANDA & ORS. v. STATE & ANR.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from a matrimonial dispute after the parties amicably settled and the complainant withdrew prosecution.
Laxmi Goel v. Income Tax Officer
The Delhi High Court directed the Income Tax Officer to expeditiously dispose of pending applications under Section 220(6) of the Income Tax Act without commenting on their merits.
Bharti Bhagwan Jadhav v. JVG Finance Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal of a claimant failing to prove valid title and payment for flats in a company liquidation, holding consent decrees void and rejecting reliance on power of attorney testimony.
D & H India Ltd. v. Superon Schweissstechnik India Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the amendment allowing the respondent to advance the date of trademark use, affirming the appellate jurisdiction of the Single Judge under the Delhi High Court Rules and the maintainability of the appeal under the Commercial Courts Act.
Tarun Sharma & Ors. v. The State (N.C.T of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and divorce decree in a matrimonial dispute.
TATA STEEL BSL LIMITED & ANR. v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
The Delhi High Court held that approval of a resolution plan under the IBC discharges the corporate debtor from prosecution for pre-CIRP offences, setting aside the complaint and summons against Tata Steel BSL Limited.
Anoop Biswas v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and criminal proceedings arising from a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement and withdrawal of prosecution by the complainant.
TOTEM-PREMCO (JV) v. RAIL VIKASH NIGAM LIMITED
The Delhi High Court granted a three-month extension for completion of arbitral proceedings and passing of the award under Section 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 upon mutual consent of the parties.
Munna Kumar Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner accused of theft under Section 380 IPC, considering his cooperation and the matrimonial dispute context.