Full Text
W.P.(C)1098/2018
CORPORAL ABHDESH KUMAR .... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Manoj Kumar Gupta and Mr. Banvendra Singh Gandhar, Advocates.
Through: None.
05.02.2020
1.Allowed,subjectto alljust exceptions.
W.P.lCl 1098/2018
ORDER
2. Subject to the Respondents verifying the details, the prayers in the present petition stand covered by the decisions dated 9^^ January,2019in W.P.(C)NO. 10026/2016 (Govind Kumar Srivastava v. Union ofIndia); decision dated 11th December, 2019 in W.P.(C)No. 5642/2019(Mohammad Israr Khan v. Union of India) and the decision dated 15th January, 2020 in W.P.(C) 9524/2019(Rakesh Kumar v. Union ofIndia).
3. Accordingly,a direction is issued to the Respondents to grant the Petitioner, 2020:DHC:3839-DB upon verification,;?ro rata pension Jfrom the datesthathe was discharged from service, with arrears being paid to the Petitioner not later than 12 weeks from today,failing which the Respondent would be liable to pay simple interest at therate of6%perannum onthesaidsumfortheperiodofdelay.
4. The petition is disposed ofwith above directions.
S. LIDHAR,J. FEBRUARY 5,2020 TALWANTSIN^H,J. \ M $-45 +
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: None. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAIENDLAW HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL ORDER % 16.03.2020 th The petition is listed today in terms ofoffice note dated 12 March, 2020.It is reported that in cause title ofthe order dated February,2020 the number of the writ petition has been wrongly mentioned as W.P.(C) No.1098/2018 instead ofW.P.(C)No.1098/2020. The order dated 05^^ February, 2020 be read as order in W.P.(C) No.1098/2020titled as Corporalabhdesh Kumar^vsUnion ofIndia& Ors.
MARCH 16,2020 afa RAJIV SAHAIENDLAW,J. SANGITA DHI G SEHGAL,J.