Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Aneesh Kumar V.S. v. State of Kerala
The Supreme Court upheld the Kerala High Court Full Bench ruling that the first Ranked List for police sub-inspector recruitment expired on 1.6.2016, barring appellants from claiming vacancies reported thereafter.
Union of India & Anr v. U.A.E. Exchange Centre
The Supreme Court held that liaison offices performing only preparatory or auxiliary activities under RBI permission do not constitute a permanent establishment under the India-UAE DTAA, and thus no income is taxable in India from such offices.
Basir Ahmed Sisodiya v. The Income Tax Officer
The Supreme Court set aside the addition of Rs. 2,26,000 as unexplained cash credits under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act after the assessee proved the genuineness of the credits through affidavits and statements of unregistered dealers.
Basir Ahmed Sisodiya v. The Income Tax Officer
The Supreme Court set aside an addition of Rs. 2,26,000 under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act after subsequent evidence established the genuineness of alleged cash credits initially treated as bogus.
Tanisha Tripathi Bhatia v. Bharat Sangh
The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Rule 135 permitting compulsory retirement of an intelligence officer on security grounds, ruling it a non-punitive administrative action not attracting Article 311 protections.
Ashish Seth v. Sumit Mittal
The Supreme Court held the Mittal Group and TFIPL liable for contempt for willful non-compliance of a settlement incorporated in its order, granting them two months to fulfill their obligations while dismissing the counter contempt petitions by the Seth Group.
Maximal Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. v. Ashish Seth
The Supreme Court held the Mittal Group liable for contempt for willful non-compliance of a court-approved settlement, granting them time to fulfill obligations including payment of development charges and license renewals, while dismissing their contempt petitions against the Seth Group.
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 416 OF 2020 [ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION [CRL] NO.2908 OF 2019] xxxx v. xxxx & ORS. .
The Supreme Court quashed the FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC as the 498A complaint was time-barred and the allegations under 406 IPC were unsustainable, holding the criminal complaint to be an abuse of process.
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 416 OF 2020 [ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION [CRL] NO.2908 OF 2019] xxxx v. xxxx & ORS. .
The Supreme Court quashed the FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC in a matrimonial dispute, holding the complaint time-barred and the criminal proceedings an abuse of process.
Shivakumar v. Sharanabasappa
The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's finding that the contested Will was not genuine due to suspicious circumstances and discrepancies, dismissing the plaintiffs' appeal.
Shivakumar v. Sharanabasappa
The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's finding that the contested Will was not genuine due to suspicious circumstances, dismissing the plaintiffs' appeal for declaration of ownership based on that Will.
Kamal Parti v. Raj Kumar Parti & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that a Will-imposed restriction requiring consent of all sons for alienation of a property includes gifts, rendering a gift deed without such consent null and void, and that Section 14 of the Hindu Succession Act does not convert the restricted estate into absolute ownership absent a pre-existing right.
Ajit Kumar v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the Delhi Government's existing measures adequately protect senior citizens during the Covid-19 lockdown and directed activation of a dedicated helpline, disposing of the PIL accordingly.
M/S. BT INDIA PRIVATE LTD. v. INCOME TAX OFFICER
The Delhi High Court quashed impugned income tax orders passed without granting reasonable opportunity during COVID-19 lockdown and directed re-hearing after lockdown withdrawal.
Reckitt Benckiser (India) Ltd. v. Hindustan Unilever Ltd
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction restraining disparaging comparative advertisements by Hindustan Unilever against Reckitt Benckiser's Dettol, emphasizing respect for prior judgments and balancing free speech with reputation rights.
Ajit Kumar v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the Delhi Government's existing measures to protect senior citizens during the Covid-19 lockdown are adequate and directed activation of a dedicated helpline for them.
M/S. BT INDIA PRIVATE LTD. v. INCOME TAX OFFICER
The Delhi High Court quashed impugned income tax orders passed without granting adequate opportunity during COVID-19 lockdown and directed fresh opportunity to respond.
National Campaign Committee for Eradication of Bonded Labour India News Communications Ltd. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that the government has taken adequate steps to provide food and ration to migrant and daily wage labourers during the COVID-19 lockdown and directed appointment of nodal officers for grievance redressal, disposing of the petition accordingly.
SAMA-RESOURCE GROUP FOR WOMEN AND HEALTH v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the State to ensure pregnant women receive essential delivery and childbirth services during COVID-19 lockdown by establishing dedicated helplines and removing access barriers.
National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India v. Alimenta S.A.
The Supreme Court held that a contract expressly providing for cancellation upon lawful government export prohibition becomes void under Section 32 of the Indian Contract Act, rendering a foreign arbitration award for damages unenforceable as against Indian public policy.