Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
State of U.P. v. Sudhir Kumar Singh and Ors.
The Supreme Court held that cancellation of a tender without hearing the successful bidder violated natural justice and caused prejudice, warranting interference under Article 14 of the Constitution.
Uttar Pradesh State v. Suresh Kumar Singh & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that unilateral termination of a State agency contract without hearing violates natural justice and writ jurisdiction is maintainable in such cases, directing fresh consideration with due process.
State of U.P. v. Sudhir Kumar Singh and Ors.
The Supreme Court held that cancellation of a tender without hearing violates natural justice and causes real prejudice, warranting setting aside the cancellation order.
Rajasthan State Road Development and Construction Corporation Ltd. v. Piyush Kant Sharma
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's interim order restraining the appellant Corporation from appointing contractual employees, holding that no employer-employee relationship existed and no reasons were assigned for the restraint.
Rajasthan State Road Development and Construction Corporation Ltd. v. Piyush Kant Sharma
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's interim order restraining a corporation from appointing new contractual employees, holding that such orders require proper reasoning and consideration of the employment relationship.
State of U.P. v. Gayatri Prasad Prajapati
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's interim bail granted on medical grounds, holding that adequate medical treatment was available in custody and the bail order was passed without proper consideration of medical reports.
State of U.P. v. Gayatri Prasad Prajapati
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's interim bail granted on medical grounds, holding that adequate medical treatment was being provided in custody and interim bail was therefore not justified.
Saravanan v. State
The Supreme Court held that no monetary conditions can be imposed while granting default bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C., affirming the accused's right to bail upon expiry of the statutory investigation period without filing a charge sheet.
Saravanan v. State
The Supreme Court held that no monetary deposit condition can be imposed while granting default bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C., affirming the accused's indefeasible right to bail upon expiry of the statutory investigation period without filing of chargesheet.
The State of Madhya Pradesh v. Bherulal
The Supreme Court dismissed a government petition filed with a 663-day delay, emphasizing that government authorities must adhere to limitation periods and cannot routinely seek condonation for bureaucratic inefficiency.
State of Madhya Pradesh v. Bherulal
The Supreme Court dismissed the State's delayed Special Leave Petition, emphasizing strict adherence to limitation laws by government authorities and imposing costs for inordinate delay.
Satish Chander Ahuja v. Sneha Ahuja
The Supreme Court held that the definition of shared household under the Domestic Violence Act is exhaustive, granting women the right to reside irrespective of ownership, and remanded the suit for fresh adjudication considering these statutory rights.
Satish Chander Ahuja v. Sneha Ahuja
The Supreme Court held that the definition of 'shared household' under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 is exhaustive and protects the aggrieved woman's right to reside irrespective of ownership, setting aside a possession decree granted without considering these rights.
Ganesan v. State
The Supreme Court upheld conviction under the POCSO Act based on the sole trustworthy testimony of the victim and dismissed the appeal challenging legal aid and compensation orders.
Hospitality Association of Mudumalai v. In Defence of Environment and Animals
The Supreme Court upheld Tamil Nadu's notification of an elephant corridor in the Sigur Plateau, affirming the State's power to protect wildlife habitats and directing inquiry into factual objections regarding corridor boundaries and enforcement actions.
Hospitality Association of Mudumalai v. In Defence of Environment and Animals
The Supreme Court upheld Tamil Nadu's notification of an elephant corridor in the Sigur Plateau, affirming the State's power to protect wildlife habitats and directing an inquiry into appellants' objections regarding corridor boundaries and eviction actions.
Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited v. Renew Wind Energy (Rajkot) Private Limited
The Supreme Court upheld the State Commission's jurisdiction to modify renewable energy PPAs to align tariffs with regulatory frameworks, dismissing appeals challenging tariff revisions under the REC mechanism.
Raghunath v. Radha Mohan
The Supreme Court held that the right of pre-emption under the Rajasthan Pre-Emption Act, 1966 is exercisable only once at the first sale after the Act's commencement and is barred by limitation if not exercised then, dismissing the suit based on a subsequent sale.
Raghunath v. Radha Mohan
The Supreme Court held that the right of pre-emption under the Rajasthan Pre-Emption Act, 1966 is exercisable only once at the first sale after the Act's commencement, and waiver or non-exercise bars its enforcement on subsequent sales, with limitation running from the first sale deed.
Hanumappa v. The State of Karnataka
The Supreme Court vacated the interim status quo order on occupancy rights over agricultural land, holding that concurrent findings rejecting tenancy claims and material change in land use do not justify continuation of interim relief.