Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Kirpa Ram v. Surendra Deo Gaur
The Supreme Court upheld the Civil Court's jurisdiction to try a suit for permanent injunction over disputed land, dismissing the appeal for lack of substantial questions of law and rejecting claims of jurisdictional bar under the Delhi Land Revenue Act.
Kirpa Ram v. Surendra Deo Gaur
The Supreme Court upheld the Civil Court's jurisdiction and dismissed the appeal, holding that no substantial question of law arose warranting interference in a suit for permanent injunction over disputed land.
UMC TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED v. FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA
The Supreme Court quashed the blacklisting of a recruitment agency by the Food Corporation of India for lack of a valid show cause notice, emphasizing strict adherence to natural justice in blacklisting orders.
Gourang Anil Wakade v. Income Tax Officer
The Bombay High Court held that reassessment notices under Sections 148 and 148A of the Income Tax Act issued to a deceased person are void ab initio and cannot bind legal heirs.
Hari Dev Acharya @ Pranavanand & Ors. v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the summoning of petitioners for failure to report child sexual abuse under Section 21 POCSO Act, holding that joint trial with the main accused for offences committed in the same transaction is permissible.
Hari Dev Acharya @ Pranavanand & Ors. v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the summoning of accused for failure to report child sexual offences, holding that joint trial of related offences within the same transaction is permissible and knowledge of the offence is essential for liability under Section 21 POCSO Act.
M/S I.S. ENTERPRISES v. JAMIA MILLIA ISLAMIA & ANR.
The Delhi High Court held that a tender condition providing only preference for a certificate cannot justify bid rejection, and that consortium bids are invalid unless expressly permitted, directing re-evaluation of bids to ensure fairness and transparency.
Crosseas Capital Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Securities and Exchange Board of India
The Bombay High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging SEBI show cause notices, holding that objections including res judicata and jurisdictional challenges must be decided together by the adjudicating authority without treating them as preliminary issues to prevent undue delay.
Gaurav Bhutani v. The Principal District and Sessions Judge Headquarters
The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of a voluntary retirement application due to insufficient qualifying service after excluding unauthorized absences and held that lockdown periods count only if properly intimated, dismissing the petitioner's claim for retirement benefits.
Venkateshwara Open University v. University Grants Commission
The Delhi High Court held that Venkateshwara Open University is a Dual Mode University under UGC Regulations and can offer distance education courses only with prior UGC approval, dismissing the petitioner's challenge to UGC communications.
Geo Varghese v. State of Rajasthan
The Supreme Court quashed the FIR under Section 306 IPC against a teacher, holding that mere reprimand without intent to abet suicide does not constitute abetment and the FIR did not disclose a prima facie offence.
Virokesh Kumar Gupta v. Rajasthan State
The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the revised selection list prepared by the Rajasthan Public Service Commission based on the second answer key, limiting judicial interference in academic evaluation and dismissing the petitioners' appeals.
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India v. M/S Bharti Airtel Ltd.
The Supreme Court allowed TRAI's interim application directing telecom service providers to disclose segmented offer details for regulatory oversight, affirming TRAI's jurisdiction subject to confidentiality safeguards.
TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA v. M/S BHARTI AIRTEL LTD. AND ORS.
The Supreme Court allowed TRAI's interim application directing telecom service providers to disclose segmented offer details, affirming TRAI's regulatory jurisdiction subject to confidentiality safeguards.
T.S.K. Ashwin Kumar v. Tubati Srivalli
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's stay on a matrimonial criminal trial, directing expeditious completion in adherence to its prior consent order.
T.S.K. Ashwin Kumar v. Tubati Srivalli
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's stay on a criminal trial, directing expeditious conclusion in adherence to its prior consent order fixing a two-month timeline.
Vetindia Pharmaceuticals Limited v. State of Uttar Pradesh
The Supreme Court set aside an indefinite blacklisting order imposed without proper notice and procedure, allowing the delayed writ petition challenging it.
Vetindia Pharmaceuticals Limited v. State of Uttar Pradesh
The Supreme Court set aside an indefinite blacklisting order imposed without proper show cause notice and procedural compliance, allowing the delayed writ petition challenging it.
C. Bright v. The District Collector
The Supreme Court held that the time limits under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act for the District Magistrate to deliver possession of secured assets are directory, not mandatory, and failure to comply does not invalidate proceedings.
C. BRIGHT v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR
The Supreme Court held that the time limits under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act for the District Magistrate to deliver possession of secured assets are directory and not mandatory, dismissing the appeal.