Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Manish Kumar Giri alias Sabi Giri v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court referred to a Full Bench the question of whether the Armed Forces Tribunal can adjudicate constitutional challenges to statutory provisions like Section 9 of the Navy Act, holding that such challenges generally lie within the exclusive jurisdiction of constitutional courts.
M/S DEN DIGITAL ENTERTAINMENT NETWORKS PVT LTD v. M/S EXPLORER ASSOCIATES
The High Court upheld the trial court's discretion to allow additional evidence before the defendant's evidence commenced, emphasizing that disputes must be decided on merits rather than procedural defaults.
Helsinn Healthcare SA v. AET Laboratories Private Limited & Anr
The Delhi High Court vacated the interim injunction against defendants for patent infringement, holding that the plaintiff failed to establish imminent threat or territorial jurisdiction for quia timet relief.
Varinder Kaur v. Daljit Kaur & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a gift deed executed by a senior citizen can be declared void under Section 23(1) of the Senior Citizens Act even without an express maintenance condition if the transferee fails to provide basic amenities and physical needs, affirming the cancellation of the gift deed in favor of the appellant.
BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR v. KAMESWAR RAO
The Delhi High Court holds that both Jurisdictional and Faceless Assessing Officers have concurrent jurisdiction to initiate reassessment under Section 148 of the Income-Tax Act, dismissing the petitioners' challenge to this view.
Huawei Technologies Cooperatief U.A. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle International Taxation-2(1)(1), Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside reassessment notices issued without information of escapement of income and directed the Assessing Officer to pass a fresh reasoned order considering all relevant facts and tax provisions.
Bed Ram v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld enhanced compensation for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, holding that 'Sailabi' land lacking building potential justifies lower valuation and that claimants failed to prove entitlement to higher compensation based on adjacent lands.
Tata Sons Private Limited & Anr. v. Svera Agro Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction protecting Tata's well-known trademarks and packaging against infringing rock salt products, exempted pre-institution mediation due to urgency, and ordered refund of court fees following early settlement.
Amit Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court quashed the ex parte dismissal of a CRPF constable due to violation of natural justice in departmental enquiry and remanded for fresh enquiry ensuring right to cross-examination and defence.
Dropadi Tripathi v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing grant of disability pension for hypertension to an Army retiree, holding that absent medical evidence attributing the disability to a non-service cause, the disability must be presumed service-connected.
Naveen Vedi v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to dispose of the petitioner’s representation under Section 117(2) of the BSF Act within three weeks, emphasizing timely administrative action before considering suspension of sentence.
Attar Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed substitution of the petitioner’s daughter as the family pension beneficiary following the death of the original beneficiary, the petitioner’s wife.
Baldev Singh & Anr. v. The District Collector Officer & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed full compliance with an unchallenged Recovery Certificate for payment to laborers, ordering balance payment with interest and costs due to respondent's non-compliance.
M/S NITYA WORLD HOLIDAYS PVT LTD & ORS v. M/S AMAN TRAVELS LTD
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against an ex-parte commercial decree due to inordinate delay and lack of sufficient cause, emphasizing strict adherence to limitation periods under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
M S Jeevika Socii Pvt Ltd v. Sales Tax Officer Class II Avato Ward 94 Zone 8 & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order passed without hearing the petitioner, granting opportunity to file reply and be heard, while leaving the validity of extension notifications pending Supreme Court decision.
M S Deep Autotec Private Limited v. Sales Tax Officer Class II Avato Ward 62 & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order passed without hearing due to suspension of GST registration, granting the petitioner an opportunity to file reply and be heard, while leaving the validity of related notifications pending before the Supreme Court.
M/S A. L. EXPORTS v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court set aside a GST appellate order passed without affording the petitioner a hearing, emphasizing the mandatory requirement of natural justice and proper communication of hearing notices.
Anil Kumar v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings and set aside conviction under Section 324 IPC based on a voluntary compromise, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC in a non-compoundable offence.
Lalan Ram v. State; Ramishwar Ram v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions under Section 307/34 IPC but modified sentences to the period already served and reduced fines, applying Supreme Court guidelines on release of convicts who have undergone substantial incarceration.
Tanpreet Kaur v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted interim protection against demolition of petitioner’s property due to procedural lapses by MCD and allowed time to file an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal.