Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Upkar Singh v. Siri Kishan Gupta
The Delhi High Court allowed the landlord's revision petition setting aside the dismissal of eviction under Section 14(1)(e) of the DRC Act, holding that family disputes cannot be considered in bona fide requirement claims and alternate accommodation must be reasonably suitable.
Mahabir Singh v. UOI & Anr.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act to Rs. 2,07,500 per Bigha, applying uniform rates to all affected villages and directing payment of balance amounts with statutory benefits.
Govinder Singh v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the dismissal of protest petitions against a cancellation report, holding that the police investigation was proper and the criminal complaint was an abuse of process in a private family property dispute.
Nazakat Ali v. State Delhi & Anr.
The High Court upheld the SDM’s order under Section 145 Cr.P.C. granting possession of disputed property to the respondent, dismissing the petitioner’s claim based on a belated and allegedly forged Sale Deed.
Neeraj Kumar Chopra v. PVR Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions challenging the trial court’s recall of a compromise on Tehbazari rights that violated the approved layout plan, directing the petitioner to seek remedy before the Division Bench.
Bala Sharma Ors. v. State (GNCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, and 120B IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Amit Taak & Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and divorce, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Sh Mohit Tyagi v. The State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under IPC and Arms Act based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Nafe Singh & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 498A IPC based on an amicable settlement between estranged spouses, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Neha Dutta v. Capitol Art House Pvt Ltd
The court upheld the trial court's refusal to admit fresh documents proving ownership after evidence closure, affirming that a party cannot deviate from pleaded tenancy rights in a suit for permanent injunction.
Dheeraj Gupta & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes on the basis of an amicable settlement and divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Adarsh Ramlila Committee v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging allotment of a plot for Ramleela celebrations, holding that respondent complied with SOP requirements and allotment was valid.
P.P. International School v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal seeking interim permission to deposit property tax under the MCD's Amnesty Scheme, holding that policy decisions on tax amnesty and related interim reliefs are not subject to judicial interference in view of a Supreme Court injunction.
Mohd. Sabir Ansari v. State (GNCTD) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279 and 337 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Boang Technology Pvt Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 30, Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing release of attached bank accounts upon deposit of twenty percent of the tax demand and permitted challenge before the Commissioner of Income Tax.
Krishna Devi v. MCD and Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted interim protection against coercive action to the petitioner challenging revocation of a sanctioned building plan, directing filing of reply and appeal despite absence of a Presiding Officer in the appellate tribunal.
Mohammad Hanif v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted interim relief by ordering temporary de-sealing of the petitioner's property and directed filing of an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal, MCD, due to procedural irregularities and absence of a Presiding Officer.
Sushil Kumar Jain v. South DMC and Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside the compulsory retirement of a government servant, holding that later good service records and promotions must be considered before exercising such power under FR 56(j).
The Trustees of Princeton University v. The Vagdevi Educational Society & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal of Princeton University, holding that its mark was used in India through reputation and publicity since 1911, entitling it to protection against the respondents' use of 'Princeton' in educational services.
Geeta Sharma v. State
The High Court held that petitions under Section 482 Cr.P.C. challenging a final order accepting a cancellation report are maintainable despite availability of revision under Section 397 Cr.P.C., and issued notice for merits, emphasizing the inherent jurisdiction to prevent abuse of process.