Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Ravi Singhania v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court restrained the MCD from executing a Sealing Order pending appeal before a non-functional Appellate Tribunal, granting interim protection to the petitioner.
Mirza Islam Baig v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted interim protection against a demolition order and directed the petitioner to file an appeal within one week before the Appellate Tribunal MCD, restraining coercive action pending the appeal due to the absence of a Presiding Officer.
Sh. Jalauddin @ Pappu v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for sexual assault of a child under POCSO and IPC, emphasizing the credibility of the child victim's testimony corroborated by medical evidence and dismissing the appeal.
Mr. Alam Bir Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 307 IPC and Arms Act provisions based on reliable injured eyewitness testimony despite inconclusive forensic evidence and challenged weapon recovery.
Sanjay Muniyan v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for sexual assault of a minor under IPC and POCSO, relying on the credible testimony of the child victim and modified the sentence to the period already served.
Hussain Ahmad & Ors. v. State
The Delhi High Court modified the appellants' conviction from attempt to murder under Section 307 IPC to voluntarily causing hurt under Section 324 IPC, reducing their sentences to the period already served while maintaining the fine.
Aadil @ Nauserwa v. State
The Delhi High Court partly allowed the appeal by substituting the appellant's conviction under Section 6 POCSO with Section 10 POCSO based on forensic evidence and consistent victim testimony, while setting aside convictions under Section 377 IPC due to lack of medical injury evidence.
Karanja Terminal and Logistics Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that no binding contract arose without approval of all consortium lenders under the OTS bid process, validating the lenders' annulment of the settlement and fresh bidding.
Jeetu Ranjeet v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court modified the appellant's conviction from aggravated penetrative sexual assault under Section 6 POCSO to 'bad touch' under Section 10 POCSO, reducing the sentence accordingly, based on inconsistencies and medical evidence.
Baniya@Raju v. State (GNCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for sexual offences against a child victim with mild intellectual disability, holding that credible child testimony alone suffices for conviction under POCSO despite absence of medical corroboration.
Rajendra Singh v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of a shopkeeper for sexual assault on a 7-year-old child under the POCSO Act based on credible sole testimony and medical evidence, dismissing the appellant's appeal.
Shubham Agarwal v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing a fresh expert medical examination to resolve a substantial discrepancy in disability assessment reports, emphasizing that the new Medical Board's report shall be final and binding.
Megha Engineering and Infrastructure Ltd. v. Income Tax Settlement Commission
The Delhi High Court held that settlement applications validly filed before the Finance Act, 2021's retrospective abolition of the Income Tax Settlement Commission must be accepted and adjudicated by the successor Interim Board, protecting taxpayers' vested rights.
Sujan Mohinder Charitable Trust v. Jupinder Kaur Maker & Ajit Singh Maker
The Delhi High Court held that an order dismissing suits as withdrawn without a formal decree under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC is not an executable decree, and thus the execution petition based on such order is not maintainable.
ELXIR TRADING PVT. LTD v. KENT RO SYSTEMS LTD
The Delhi High Court modified the order for executing commission in a design infringement suit by appointing a local Commissioner to inspect the appellant's premises under strict terms ensuring cooperation and transparency.
Zafaruddin Khan Faizan v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted interim protection against demolition of the petitioner's property due to the non-functioning of the MCD Appellate Tribunal, based on the MCD's assurance, without deciding the merits.
M/S KCA Infrastructure & Anr. v. HDB Financial Services Limited
The Delhi High Court held that the designation of Chennai as the venue of arbitration did not confer exclusive jurisdiction on Chennai courts, restoring the Section 34 petition in Delhi based on the respondent's prior acquiescence to Delhi jurisdiction under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax – 1 v. M/s Agroha Fincap Ltd.
Delhi High Court allowed the Revenue's appeal, holding that the approval for reopening assessment under Section 151 was valid despite brief language, setting aside ITAT's quashing of reassessment proceedings.
Ashok Kumar Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition seeking backdating and regularization of promotion, holding that eligibility for promotion depends on completion of prescribed service period and no error was apparent in the original order.
Tapas Chatterjee v. Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of a patent application for a process recovering potassium sulphate from distillery effluent, holding it obvious and non-patentable under Section 3(d) for lacking inventive step and new reactants or products.