Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Alkem Laboratories Ltd. v. Alchem International Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction restraining the defendant from using the deceptively similar trademark 'ALCHEM' for pharmaceutical products, rejecting the defence of acquiescence and delay.
Vinod Kumar & Ors. v. State Through SHO Sangam Vihar South Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 506, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and divorce between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Kuldeep Singh Dabas v. GNCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that pay re-fixation orders affecting an employee's emoluments must be preceded by a show-cause notice and allowed the petitioner to challenge the pay re-fixation afresh, setting aside the Tribunal's limited order on recovery.
Union of India v. S K Jasra
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order setting aside a chargesheet issued without disciplinary authority approval, affirming that such a chargesheet is void ab initio and cannot be retrospectively validated.
Mr. Durga Dutt, Mr. Sahib Kochhar, Ms. Shayal Anand, Mr. Sai Manik Sud and Mr. Aryan Mishra v. Union of India and Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and dismissal of a BSF officer for attempt to murder under Section 307 IPC, rejecting his claim of accidental firing and affirming limited judicial interference in Security Force Court proceedings.
Suresh Sankhla v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of the petitioner's representations against adverse performance appraisal remarks, holding that no reasons are mandatorily required to be recorded or communicated in such administrative orders and that subjective assessments warrant judicial deference.
Sub Krishan Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the disciplinary punishment and discharge of a military serviceman for disobedience of lawful command, affirming limited judicial interference in Army Act proceedings while directing pension formalities to be completed.
Abhijeet Adhikari v. The State Govt of NCT Delhi
The Delhi High Court suspended the life imprisonment sentence of a convicted murderer during the pendency of appeal, relying on prolonged incarceration, defense of suicidal death, and absence of external injuries.
Komal Garg v. Mohit Arora & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of tenants on landlord's bona fide need grounds, holding that unsubstantiated claims of alternative accommodation do not warrant leave to defend under the Delhi Rent Control Act.
G. Prasad Raghavan v. Union Territory of Puducherry
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and discharged the appellant from criminal charges, holding that mere purchase of property from accused without involvement in prior fraud does not attract criminal liability.
S.K. JAIN v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
The Supreme Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's substitution of conviction under Section 63 of the Army Act for possession of ammunition and confirmed the punishment of compulsory retirement, dismissing the appellant's appeal.
M/s. Mukesh Patel and Ors. v. Pant Nagar Ganesh Krupa Cooperative Housing Society Limited; Avvad Spaces LLP; Shubham Ambience Co-Operative Housing Society Limited
The Bombay High Court held that Avvad Spaces LLP is not a veritable party to the arbitration agreement between Mukesh Patel and the Merged Society, and appointed an arbitrator solely between Patel and the Merged Society, emphasizing the necessity of consent and factual privity for impleading non-signatories in arbitration.
Manisha Arjun Sakore v. Pune Municipal Corporation
The Bombay High Court quashed an illegal suspension order against a municipal teacher for procedural lapses, directing reinstatement with full salary and emphasizing strict adherence to disciplinary procedures under Section 56 of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act.
Nandini Prakash Ingawale & Ors. v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The Bombay High Court dismissed petitions challenging cancellation of nursing course admissions for non-fulfillment of eligibility criteria, holding that illegal admissions cannot be condoned and ordering refund of fees and damages.
Deshmukh Enterprises v. Paramount Park D Tenant Co-Op Housing Society Ltd.
The Bombay High Court quashed the registration of a cooperative housing society obtained fraudulently and without jurisdiction, emphasizing the promoter's rights and statutory compliance under MOFA and MAO Acts.
Nashik Municipal Corporation v. Sunil Baburao Kshirsagar & Ors.
The Court held that while Section 433A of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act bars Civil Court jurisdiction over suits challenging municipal notices of unauthorized construction, suits may be entertained on limited grounds such as nullity or bad faith, and the plaint must be examined to determine applicability of the bar.
Manjeet Singh v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court corrected a typographical error in the probation period from one year to nine months and clarified the conditions and consequences of probation for the appellant.
MS Farheen Israil & Anr. v. Ghulam Rasool Wani & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the landlord's revision petition, setting aside the order granting leave to defend to unauthorized occupants and ordering eviction on bona fide requirement grounds under the Delhi Rent Control Act.
Kanhaiya Lal and Ors. v. Subhash Chander and Another
The Delhi High Court allowed delayed impleadment of legal heirs in trademark rectification proceedings, condoning delay and setting aside abatement to ensure adjudication on merits.
Mukesh v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of a father for sexually assaulting his minor daughter, relying on the child's credible testimony and corroborative DNA evidence, affirming the application of Section 29 POCSO presumption.