Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
The Commissioner of Sales Tax, Mumbai v. M/s. Mardia Steel Ltd.
The Bombay High Court held that revisional powers under Section 57 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act cannot be exercised by officers of coordinate rank and upheld the Tribunal’s rectification of an invalid revisional order.
Union of India v. Suresh Kumar Meena
The Delhi High Court upheld the entitlement of a Scheduled Tribe candidate to one grace mark under a binding Department of Posts order, dismissing the Union of India's petition challenging the grant of promotion.
Sharad Nagnath Bubne v. State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court held that employees of aided Ayurvedic Colleges who took voluntary retirement after qualifying service are entitled to pensionary benefits and quashed the State's arbitrary denial of such benefits.
Krishan Kumar Singh v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an unconditional resignation results in forfeiture of pension rights under NABARD Pension Regulations, rejecting the petitioner's claim equating resignation with voluntary retirement.
V.P. Kathuria and Ors. v. Cement Corporation of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that employees who retired or resigned before delayed DPCs but were in service on the retrospective promotion date are entitled to notional promotions with consequential benefits.
Sandeep Maruti Raskar v. District Magistrate cum District Election Officer and Ors.
The court held that deletion of a name from the municipal voters list must be challenged through statutory remedies against the legislative assembly electoral roll deletion, dismissing the writ petition for failure to exhaust such remedies.
J. K. Industries v. Krishna Sahal & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that under Section 244 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, an assessee is entitled to interest on the refund of interest paid under Section 220(2), including interest on refunded interest for assessment years prior to 1989.
M/s. Shri Tirthankar Co. v. Adyaprasad Hingoo Mishra & Ors.
The Bombay High Court modified the trial court’s decree on adverse possession to reflect actual possession of 38 sq. meters as per a Court Receiver’s report, relying on its appellate powers under Order XLI CPC.
Anand Prabhakar Joshi v. Bank of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court dismissed the petitioner’s second review petition as barred by law, upheld the disciplinary findings of unauthorized absence, and imposed exemplary costs for abuse of process.
MMTC Ltd v. P. K. Das & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld that recovery of long-standing excess perks paid to retired senior executives sanctioned by the employer's Board is impermissible and violates Article 14, dismissing MMTC's appeal.
The Commissioner of Sales Tax, Maharashtra State v. M/s Superphone India Ltd
The Bombay High Court held that interlocutory part payment orders under the Bombay Sales Tax Act do not attain finality if unchallenged and can be questioned in appeals against summary rejection orders, affirming the appellate authority's power to modify such orders.
M.B.K. Enterprises & Ors. v. Saidpur Jute Co. Ltd & Ors.
The court upheld eviction of tenants for unlawful subletting beyond permitted limits and unauthorized structural alterations, affirming that sub-lessees cannot further sublet without express lease permission under the Bombay Rent Act.
Raghu Dasma Ghadaga v. Project Officer, Dapchari Dugdha Prakalpa
The Bombay High Court dismissed the petition seeking permanency benefits for temporary workers at the Dapchari Milk Project, holding that without sanctioned posts and following closure of the relevant project section, no right to permanency arises.
BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd. v. D.P. Sharma
An employee who avails voluntary retirement under SVRS on a reduced pay scale cannot later claim retrospective enhancement of pay or benefits subsumed within the SVRS package.
Modern Mumbai Educational Academy v. Mrs. Mangal Pravin P. Kalbhor
The Bombay High Court upheld the School Tribunal's order setting aside a termination for procedural violations under Rule 36 of MEPS Rules, emphasizing the necessity of fair inquiry and the doctrine of necessity to avoid bias where the President was related to the accused.
Smt Usha Devi v. Union of India and Anr
The Delhi High Court held that dismissal for habitual unauthorized absence does not bar grant of compassionate allowance under Rule 41 of the CCS (Pension) Rules if the misconduct does not involve moral turpitude or dishonesty, and directed grant of allowance to the petitioner widow.
Director, Employees' State Insurance Corporation v. M/s. Jolly Steel Industries Pvt. Ltd.
The Bombay High Court held that under Section 93-A of the ESI Act, a factory owner is not liable for contribution payments for periods after leasing out the factory, dismissing the ESIC's appeal against M/s. Jolly Steel Industries Pvt. Ltd.
Suryakant Tarachand Bhatewara & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The Bombay High Court upheld the validity of land acquisition awards for the Neera Deodhar Project, directed payment of balance compensation with interest, and ordered initiation of acquisition proceedings for remaining land under the Fair Compensation Act.
Rangrao Mahadu Pethkar v. Sadashiv Maruti Vibhute & Ors.
The Bombay High Court upheld the termination of tenancy and restoration of possession to landlords where the tenant defaulted on rent for three years with proper notices under the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, rejecting the tenant’s claim of deemed purchase and non-service of termination notice.
Reliance Industries Limited v. Commissioner of Income-tax Mumbai City-VI
The Bombay High Court held that assessment orders passed against non-existent amalgamating companies post-merger are void ab initio and framed a substantial question of law on jurisdiction, permitting additional evidence to determine the Assessing Officer's knowledge of the merger.