Search Judgments

Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name

Uma Pradeep Divate v. Chandra Gulab Advani & Ors.

High Court of Bombay · 24 Sep 1948

The Court held that an assignment of tenancy disguised as a transfer of a running business without genuine intention to continue the business amounts to unlawful subletting, allowing eviction of the tenant.

property appeal_allowed

Prabhat Sadan Properties Pvt Ltd v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai

High Court of Bombay · 31 Jan 1946

The Bombay High Court held that for compulsorily registrable documents, transfer premium must be computed from the date of execution of the document, not the date of registration, and quashed MCGM's fresh demand based on later rates.

civil petition_allowed

Geeta Mangesh Laud & Ors. v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

High Court of Bombay · 28 Mar 1942

The Bombay High Court held that requisitioned premises remain under requisition until physical possession is returned to the owner, validating eviction orders under the Bombay Land Requisition Act, 1948 and directing the State to hand over possession to the owner.

property appeal_dismissed

Purnima Talkies v. Chief Officer, Dahanu Nagar Parishad

High Court of Bombay · 01 Oct 1939

The court held that land acquisition by granting TDR/FSI requires a concluded agreement, and in absence thereof, acquisition must follow the 2013 Act with payment of monetary compensation before demolition.

property petition_allowed

Nikhilesh Keshrichand Jhaveri v. M.S Johnson Dye Works Pvt. Ltd.

High Court of Bombay · 23 Dec 1938

The Bombay High Court upheld orders directing lessees to deposit outstanding water charges under Order XV-A of the CPC despite primary statutory liability resting on the occupier, clarifying the distinction between water taxes and water charges under the MMC Act.

civil appeal_dismissed

Shri. Harilal Anurup Awadhia and Ors. v. Prabhakar Shravan Shinde

High Court of Bombay · 01 Nov 1928

The Bombay High Court upheld eviction of a tenant for unauthorized dominant residential use of commercial premises, clarifying that change of user alone suffices for eviction under Section 108(o) of the Transfer of Property Act and Section 13(1)(a) of the Bombay Rent Act.

civil petition_dismissed