Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Novenco Building and Industry A/S v. Xero Energy Engineering Solutions Private Ltd. & Anr.
The Supreme Court held that suits alleging continuing intellectual property infringement accompanied by a genuine prayer for interim injunction contemplate urgent interim relief under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, exempting them from mandatory pre-institution mediation.
Pankaj Tomar v. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha
The Delhi High Court held that employees of IGIT continue as employees of IGDTUW under the 2012 Act and are not entitled to transfer back to GGSIPU, dismissing the petitioner’s writ seeking such transfer.
Amar Pal Nanhey v. State (GNCT of Delhi) and Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's bail application in a serious sexual assault case involving a minor, emphasizing the gravity of offences and the need for heightened caution at the bail stage.
Everest Entertainment LLP v. Mahesh Vaman Manjrekar & Ors.
The Bombay High Court refused interim injunction against the release of a film alleging copyright infringement and passing off due to gross delay and lack of prima facie case.
Metrro Waste Handling Pvt. Ltd. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that a short-term tender for non-conforming mixed waste does not infringe the petitioner's exclusive rights under a long-term waste management Concession Agreement.
Mohan Dhotre v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The High Court held that the State Government lacked jurisdiction under Section 15 of the Bombay Labour Welfare Fund Act, 1953 to dismiss the petitioner from the Maharashtra Labour Welfare Board, quashing the dismissal order passed on a withdrawn complaint.
XYZ v. Arun Shankar Khutale
The Bombay High Court upheld the acquittal of an accused in a POCSO sexual assault case, holding that statements under Section 164 CrPC and victim's disclosures to her mother are insufficient alone to convict without direct evidence.
Rushikesh @ Monya Shamrao Waghere v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court held that a preventive detention proposal must include prior verification of in-camera witness statements before submission, quashing a detention order based on post-submission verification as procedurally defective.
Sangita Nandu Toradmal v. State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court upheld a preventive detention order against a person in judicial custody, holding that the detaining authority's subjective satisfaction and procedural compliance under the MPDA Act were valid.
Pune Municipal Corporation v. Yeshwant Sadashiv Gaikwad & Ors.
The Bombay High Court dismissed the Pune Municipal Corporation's second appeal, upholding that demolition of a building constructed before municipal limits inclusion without proper procedure was illegal and that enlarged map evidence shown during cross-examination was rightly considered.
Somshekar Kashinath Babaladi v. Union of India
The Bombay High Court held that disciplinary proceedings initiated beyond the four-year limitation period under Rule 9 of CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, against a retired employee for caste-based reservation claims are illegal, quashing the penalty of pension forfeiture.
Jyoti Jayesh Tayade v. The Commissioner
The court held that an employee acquiring disability during service cannot be terminated and is entitled to salary and benefits during the disability period under Section 47 of the Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995.
Amit Jindal v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed quashing of a dowry harassment FIR following an amicable settlement and corrected typographical errors in its earlier judgment.
Tata Capital Limited v. Pinky
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act after a prima facie finding of a valid arbitration agreement, limiting judicial scrutiny to existence and not arbitrability of disputes.
M/S NARESH KUMAR GUPTA AND CO PVT LTD v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court appointed a neutral arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate contractual disputes where the respondent failed to appoint an arbitrator as per the arbitration clause.
Chand Vij v. Govt of NCT Delhi
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that the court's role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement, leaving merits and arbitrability to the arbitral tribunal.
Sangam Vihar Vikas Manch v. Union of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court closed the review petition after the GNCTD committed to constructing an Ayushman Arogya Mandir within six months, binding it to this undertaking.
National Highways Authority of India v. Larsen and Tourbo Limited
The Delhi High Court set aside portions of an arbitral award for awarding damages beyond pleaded claims without giving parties an opportunity to be heard, emphasizing strict adherence to pleadings and natural justice under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Directorate of Enforcement v. M/s Hi-Tech Mercantile India Pvt Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the quashing of a Provisional Attachment Order under PMLA, ruling that coal block allocation letters do not constitute property or proceeds of crime, and PMLA proceedings must align with the scope of the predicate offence.
KIRANJIT GUJRAL & ORS. v. PAMINDER GUJRAL & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that probate proceedings do not bar partition suits under Section 10 CPC but allowed a stay under inherent powers pending probate adjudication, and upheld a preliminary decree partitioning moveable assets on admissions.